lackluster

As adjectives the difference between lackluster and abysmal

is that lackluster is lacking brilliance or intelligence while abysmal is (now|rare) pertaining to, or resembling an abyss; unending; profound; fathomless; immeasurable .

As adjectives the difference between weak and lackluster

is that weak is lacking in force (usually strength) or ability while lackluster is lacking brilliance or intelligence.

As adjectives the difference between dismal and lackluster

is that dismal is disappointingly inadequate while lackluster is lacking brilliance or intelligence.

As adjectives the difference between lackluster and subpar

is that lackluster is lacking brilliance or intelligence while subpar is being of less than a traditional or accepted standard.

As an adjective lackluster

is lacking brilliance or intelligence.

As a verb bad is

to simulate.

As adjectives the difference between lackluster and poor

is that lackluster is lacking brilliance or intelligence while poor is with little or no possessions or money.

As a noun poor is

(with "the") those who have little or no possessions or money, taken as a group.

As adjectives the difference between mediocre and lackluster

is that mediocre is mediocre (ordinary: not extraordinary; not special, exceptional, or great; of medium quality) while lackluster is lacking brilliance or intelligence.

As a verb slump

is (lb) to collapse heavily or helplessly.

As a noun slump

is a heavy or helpless collapse; a slouching or drooping posture; a period of poor activity or performance, especially an extended period.

As an adjective lackluster is

lacking brilliance or intelligence.

As adjectives the difference between torpid and lackluster

is that torpid is unmoving, dormant or hibernating while lackluster is lacking brilliance or intelligence.

As adjectives the difference between crestfallen and lackluster

is that crestfallen is sad because of a recent disappointment while lackluster is lacking brilliance or intelligence.