lorel

As nouns the difference between sorel and lorel

is that sorel is (zoology) a young buck in the third year while lorel is a good-for-nothing fellow; a vagabond; losel.

As nouns the difference between terms and lorel

is that terms is while lorel is a good-for-nothing fellow; a vagabond; losel.

As a noun lorel

is a good-for-nothing fellow; a vagabond; losel.

As an adjective lored is

having a lore, of a certain type, usually a color.

As nouns the difference between lorel and morel

is that lorel is a good-for-nothing fellow; a vagabond; losel while morel is any of several edible mushrooms, especially the common morel or yellow morel.

As a noun lorel

is a good-for-nothing fellow; a vagabond; losel.

As an adjective loral is

(anatomy) of or pertaining to the lore.

As nouns the difference between lozel and lorel

is that lozel is alternative form of losel while lorel is a good-for-nothing fellow; a vagabond; losel.

As nouns the difference between forel and lorel

is that forel is a kind of parchment for book covers; a forrill while lorel is a good-for-nothing fellow; a vagabond; losel.

As a verb forel

is to bind with a forel.

As nouns the difference between loreal and lorel

is that loreal is (zoology) any of the loreal scales while lorel is a good-for-nothing fellow; a vagabond; losel.

As an adjective loreal

is (anatomy) of or pertaining to the lore.

As an adjective lore

is their.

As a noun lorel is

a good-for-nothing fellow; a vagabond; losel.

As nouns the difference between losel and lorel

is that losel is a worthless or despicable person while lorel is a good-for-nothing fellow; a vagabond; losel.

As an adjective losel

is worthless; wasteful.