neurolaw

As nouns the difference between terms and neurolaw

is that terms is while neurolaw is an emerging field of interdisciplinary study that explores the effects of discoveries in neuroscience on legal rules and standards.

As nouns the difference between neurolaw and neurolawyer

is that neurolaw is an emerging field of interdisciplinary study that explores the effects of discoveries in neuroscience on legal rules and standards while neurolawyer is a lawyer specialising in neurolaw.

As an adjective legal

is legal, lawful.

As a noun neurolaw is

an emerging field of interdisciplinary study that explores the effects of discoveries in neuroscience on legal rules and standards.

As nouns the difference between neuroscience and neurolaw

is that neuroscience is the scientific study of the nervous system while neurolaw is an emerging field of interdisciplinary study that explores the effects of discoveries in neuroscience on legal rules and standards.

As nouns the difference between study and neurolaw

is that study is (label) a state of mental perplexity or worried thought while neurolaw is an emerging field of interdisciplinary study that explores the effects of discoveries in neuroscience on legal rules and standards.

As a verb study

is (usually|academic) to revise materials already learned in order to make sure one does not forget them, usually in preparation for an examination.

As an adjective interdisciplinary

is of or pertaining to multiple distinct academic disciplines or fields of study.

As a noun neurolaw is

an emerging field of interdisciplinary study that explores the effects of discoveries in neuroscience on legal rules and standards.

As a proper noun field

is .

As a noun neurolaw is

an emerging field of interdisciplinary study that explores the effects of discoveries in neuroscience on legal rules and standards.