unaccusative

As nouns the difference between unaccusative and null

is that unaccusative is (linguistics) an unaccusative verb while null is zero, nil; the cardinal number before einn.

As an adjective unaccusative

is (linguistics|of a verb) intransitive and having an experiencer as its subject, that is, the (syntactic) subject is not a (semantic) agent.

As a letter s

is the letter s with a.

As an adjective unaccusative is

(linguistics|of a verb) intransitive and having an experiencer as its subject, that is, the (syntactic) subject is not a (semantic) agent.

As a noun unaccusative is

(linguistics) an unaccusative verb.

As nouns the difference between terms and unaccusative

is that terms is while unaccusative is (linguistics) an unaccusative verb.

As an adjective unaccusative is

(linguistics|of a verb) intransitive and having an experiencer as its subject, that is, the (syntactic) subject is not a (semantic) agent.

As adjectives the difference between unaccusative and undefined

is that unaccusative is (linguistics|of a verb) intransitive and having an experiencer as its subject, that is, the (syntactic) subject is not a (semantic) agent while undefined is lacking a definition or value.

As a noun unaccusative

is (linguistics) an unaccusative verb.

In linguistics|lang=en terms the difference between ergative and unaccusative

is that ergative is (linguistics) an ergative verb or other expression while unaccusative is (linguistics) an unaccusative verb.

As adjectives the difference between ergative and unaccusative

is that ergative is (grammar) used of various situations where the subject of transitive constructions have different grammatical cases or thematic relations to those of intransitive constructions while unaccusative is (linguistics|of a verb) intransitive and having an experiencer as its subject, that is, the (syntactic) subject is not a (semantic) agent.

As nouns the difference between ergative and unaccusative

is that ergative is (linguistics) the ergative case while unaccusative is (linguistics) an unaccusative verb.

As nouns the difference between unaccusative and unaccusativity

is that unaccusative is (linguistics) an unaccusative verb while unaccusativity is the state or property of being unaccusative.

As an adjective unaccusative

is (linguistics|of a verb) intransitive and having an experiencer as its subject, that is, the (syntactic) subject is not a (semantic) agent.

Unaccusative is a related term of accusative.

As adjectives the difference between accusative and unaccusative

is that accusative is producing accusations; accusatory; accusatorial; in a manner that reflects a finding of fault or blame while unaccusative is intransitive and having an experiencer as its subject, that is, the (syntactic) subject is not a (semantic) agent.

As nouns the difference between accusative and unaccusative

is that accusative is the accusative case while unaccusative is an unaccusative verb.

Intransitive is a hyponym of unaccusative.

As adjectives the difference between intransitive and unaccusative

is that intransitive is (grammar|of a verb) not transitive: not having, or not taking, a direct object while unaccusative is (linguistics|of a verb) intransitive and having an experiencer as its subject, that is, the (syntactic) subject is not a (semantic) agent.

As a noun unaccusative is

(linguistics) an unaccusative verb.

Transitive is an antonym of unaccusative.

As adjectives the difference between transitive and unaccusative

is that transitive is making a (l) or passage while unaccusative is (linguistics|of a verb) intransitive and having an experiencer as its subject, that is, the (syntactic) subject is not a (semantic) agent.

As a noun unaccusative is

(linguistics) an unaccusative verb.

As nouns the difference between agent and unaccusative

is that agent is agent (intermediary for certain services, such as for artistic performances or public relations) while unaccusative is (linguistics) an unaccusative verb.

As an adjective unaccusative is

(linguistics|of a verb) intransitive and having an experiencer as its subject, that is, the (syntactic) subject is not a (semantic) agent.