Wireless vs Null - What's the difference?
wireless | null |
Not having any wires.
Of or relating to communication without a wired connection, such as by radio waves.
(label) The medium of radio communication.
*{{quote-book, year=1935, author=
, title=Death on the Centre Court, chapter=3
, passage=It had been his intention to go to Wimbledon, but as he himself said: “Why be blooming well frizzled when you can hear all the results over the wireless . And results are all that concern me. […]”}}
(label) A radio set.
(label) Wireless connectivity to a computer network.
To send a message by wireless (by radio)
*
----
A non-existent or empty value or set of values.
Zero]] quantity of [[expression, expressions; nothing.
Something that has no force or meaning.
(computing) the ASCII or Unicode character (), represented by a zero value, that indicates no character and is sometimes used as a string terminator.
(computing) the attribute of an entity that has no valid value.
One of the beads in nulled work.
(statistics) null hypothesis
Having no validity, "null and void"
insignificant
* 1924 , Marcel Proust, Within a Budding Grove :
absent or non-existent
(mathematics) of the null set
(mathematics) of or comprising a value of precisely zero
(genetics, of a mutation) causing a complete loss of gene function, amorphic.
As nouns the difference between wireless and null
is that wireless is (label) the medium of radio communication while null is zero, nil; the cardinal number before einn.As an adjective wireless
is not having any wires.As a verb wireless
is to send a message by wireless (by radio).wireless
English
Adjective
(-)Synonyms
* cordlessAntonyms
* wiredNoun
(wikipedia wireless) (wirelesses)George Goodchild
Derived terms
* wireless operatorVerb
null
English
Noun
(en noun)- (Francis Bacon)
- Since no date of birth was entered for the patient, his age is null .
Adjective
(en adjective)- In proportion as we descend the social scale our snobbishness fastens on to mere nothings which are perhaps no more null than the distinctions observed by the aristocracy, but, being more obscure, more peculiar to the individual, take us more by surprise.