censor

As verbs the difference between surveil and censor

is that surveil is (nonstandard) to keep someone or something under surveillance while censor is to review in order to remove objectionable content from correspondence or public media, either by legal criteria or with discretionary powers.

As a noun censor is

(history) a roman magistrate, originally a census administrator, by classical times a high judge of public behavior and morality.

As nouns the difference between surveillance and censor

is that surveillance is close observation of an individual or group; person or persons under suspicion while censor is (history) a roman magistrate, originally a census administrator, by classical times a high judge of public behavior and morality.

As a verb censor is

to review in order to remove objectionable content from correspondence or public media, either by legal criteria or with discretionary powers.

As nouns the difference between rebuke and censor

is that rebuke is a harsh criticism while censor is (history) a roman magistrate, originally a census administrator, by classical times a high judge of public behavior and morality.

As verbs the difference between rebuke and censor

is that rebuke is to criticise harshly; to reprove while censor is to review in order to remove objectionable content from correspondence or public media, either by legal criteria or with discretionary powers.

As verbs the difference between censor and learn

is that censor is to review in order to remove objectionable content from correspondence or public media, either by legal criteria or with discretionary powers while learn is to acquire, or attempt to acquire knowledge or an ability to do something or learn can be .

As a noun censor

is (history) a roman magistrate, originally a census administrator, by classical times a high judge of public behavior and morality.

As nouns the difference between vet and censor

is that vet is a veterinarian or veterinary surgeon while censor is a Roman magistrate, originally a census administrator, by Classical times a high judge of public behavior and morality.

As verbs the difference between vet and censor

is that vet is to thoroughly check or investigate particularly with regard to providing formal approval while censor is to review in order to remove objectionable content from correspondence or public media, either by legal criteria or with discretionary powers.

As nouns the difference between censor and delete

is that censor is a Roman magistrate, originally a census administrator, by Classical times a high judge of public behavior and morality while delete is an alternative spelling of Delete|lang=en.

As verbs the difference between censor and delete

is that censor is to review in order to remove objectionable content from correspondence or public media, either by legal criteria or with discretionary powers while delete is to remove, get rid of or erase, especially written or printed material, or data on a computer.

In transitive terms the difference between censor and play

is that censor is to remove objectionable content while play is to keep in play, as a hooked fish, in order to land it.

Juror is a related term of censor.

As nouns the difference between juror and censor

is that juror is juror, member of a jury while censor is (history) a roman magistrate, originally a census administrator, by classical times a high judge of public behavior and morality.

As a verb censor is

to review in order to remove objectionable content from correspondence or public media, either by legal criteria or with discretionary powers.

Censor is a related term of umpire.

In lang=en terms the difference between censor and umpire

is that censor is to remove objectionable content while umpire is to decide as an umpire; to arbitrate; to settle (a dispute, etc).

As nouns the difference between censor and umpire

is that censor is (history) a roman magistrate, originally a census administrator, by classical times a high judge of public behavior and morality while umpire is (tennis) the official who presides over a tennis game sat on a high chair.

As verbs the difference between censor and umpire

is that censor is to review in order to remove objectionable content from correspondence or public media, either by legal criteria or with discretionary powers while umpire is (sports|intransitive) to act as an umpire in a game.

Arbiter is a related term of censor.

In lang=en terms the difference between arbiter and censor

is that arbiter is to act as arbiter while censor is to remove objectionable content.

As nouns the difference between arbiter and censor

is that arbiter is a person appointed, or chosen, by parties to determine a controversy between them; an arbitrator while censor is (history) a roman magistrate, originally a census administrator, by classical times a high judge of public behavior and morality.

As verbs the difference between arbiter and censor

is that arbiter is to act as arbiter while censor is to review in order to remove objectionable content from correspondence or public media, either by legal criteria or with discretionary powers.