Terms vs Apanthropinisation - What's the difference?
terms | apanthropinisation |
(rare) The broadening of the ambit of one’s preoccupations and concerns away from a narrow focus on those things most palpably human and most closely pertinent to humanity.“apanthropinization” listed
* 1880, Oct.: , Mind'', volume 5 (? 20),
* 1881, Jan.: '', volume 18 (1880–1881),
* 2005, Mar.: Anne-Julia Zwierlein (editor), Unmapped Countries: Biological Visions in Nineteenth-Century Literature and Culture ,
As nouns the difference between terms and apanthropinisation
is that terms is while apanthropinisation is (rare) the broadening of the ambit of one’s preoccupations and concerns away from a narrow focus on those things most palpably human and most closely pertinent to humanity“apanthropinization” listed [http://booksgooglecouk/books?id=qhccaaaamaaj&q=apanthropinization&dq=apanthropinization&ei=hdvwsctmhqkiyasj8aidbw&pgis=1 on pages 50–51] of joseph twadell shipley’s dictionary of early english (1955 ; philosophical library).apanthropinisation
English
Alternative forms
* apanthropinizationNoun
(-)on pages 50–51of Joseph Twadell Shipley’s Dictionary of Early English (1955 ; Philosophical Library)
page 451] [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=F_0EAAAAQAAJ&q=apanthropinisation&dq=apanthropinisation&ei=_c1WSdnaDKTmyAT-67mlCQ&pgis=1 ?] (Williams and Norgate) · (also quoted, with scant little alteration, [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=3pINAAAAQAAJ&q=apanthropinisation&dq=apanthropinisation&ei=_c1WSdnaDKTmyAT-67mlCQ&pgis=1 on page 292] of ''The Academy[? 18, 1880)
- In short, the primitive human conception of beauty must, I believe, have been purely anthropinistic'' — must have gathered mainly around the personality of man or woman; and all its subsequent history must be that of an ''apanthropinisation (I apologise for the ugly but convenient word), a gradual regression or concentric widening of æsthetic feeling around this fixed point which remains to the very last its natural centre.
page 344] [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=aaMVAAAAYAAJ&dq=apanthropinization&ei=HdVWScTmHqKIyASJ8aiDBw ?] (D. Appleton); quoting ''verbatim'', but not ''literatim'', the text of the first occurrence in ''Mind[1880] [[#Quotations, hereinbefore] (minor adjustments to Americanise the spelling have been made)
- In short, the primitive human conception of beauty must, I believe, have been purely anthropinistic'' — must have gathered mainly around the personality of man or woman; and all its subsequent history must be that of an ''apanthropinization (I apologize for the ugly but convenient word), a gradual regression or concentric widening of æsthetic feeling around this fixed point which remains to the very last its natural center.
page 114] ([http://www.anthempress.com/product_info.php?&products_id=143&osCsid= Anthem Press; ISBN 1843311607, 978?1843311607)
- From this early, ‘anthropinistic’ stage, at which all aesthetic feeling is ‘gathered mainly around the personality of man or woman’, human aesthetic feeling gradually evolves in a process of apanthropinization , ‘a gradual regression or concentric widening of aesthetic feeling around this fixed point’,59 and advances to the appreciation of beauty in nature.60