Notorious vs Tedious - What's the difference?
notorious | tedious |
Widely known, especially for something bad; infamous.
* 1920 , "This is the last straw. In your infatuation for this man — a man who is notorious for his excesses, a man your father would not have allowed to so much as mention your name — you have reflected the demi-monde]] rather than the circles in which you have presumably grown up." — by [[w:F. Scott Fitzgerald, F. Scott Fitzgerald
* 1999', ''"The Hempshocks' sheep were '''notoriously the finest for miles around: shaggy-coated and intelligent (for sheep), with curling horns and sharp hooves."'' — Neil Gaiman, ''Stardust , pg. 30 (2001 Perennial edition)
Boring, monotonous, time consuming, wearisome.
* {{quote-book
, year=
, author=Arthur Schopenhauer
, title=The Art of Literature
, chapter=2
* {{quote-book
, year=
, author=Arthur Schopenhauer
, title=The Art of Literature
, chapter=2
As adjectives the difference between notorious and tedious
is that notorious is widely known, especially for something bad; infamous while tedious is boring, monotonous, time consuming, wearisome.notorious
English
Adjective
(en adjective)Synonyms
* ill-famed * infamoustedious
English
Alternative forms
* (archaic)Adjective
(en adjective)citation, passage=A work is objectively tedious' when it contains the defect in question; that is to say, when its author has no perfectly clear thought or knowledge to communicate. For if a man has any clear thought or knowledge in him, his aim will be to communicate it, and he will direct his energies to this end; so that the ideas he furnishes are everywhere clearly expressed. The result is that he is neither diffuse, nor unmeaning, nor confused, and consequently not ' tedious .}}
citation, passage=The other kind of tediousness is only relative: a reader may find a work dull because he has no interest in the question treated of in it, and this means that his intellect is restricted. The best work may, therefore, be tedious' subjectively, ' tedious .}}
