Slops vs Null - What's the difference?
slops | null |
Scraps that will be fed to animals, particularly to hogs.
(in the plural, nautical, dated) clothing and bedding issued to sailors
(in the plural, nautical, dated) sailors' breeches ending just below the knees or above the ankles, worn mainly in XVIII century
* 2012 , Nelson's navy , by Philip Haythornthwaite, page 26:
(in the plural, dated) The dirty wastewater of a house.
A non-existent or empty value or set of values.
Zero]] quantity of [[expression, expressions; nothing.
Something that has no force or meaning.
(computing) the ASCII or Unicode character (), represented by a zero value, that indicates no character and is sometimes used as a string terminator.
(computing) the attribute of an entity that has no valid value.
One of the beads in nulled work.
(statistics) null hypothesis
Having no validity, "null and void"
insignificant
* 1924 , Marcel Proust, Within a Budding Grove :
absent or non-existent
(mathematics) of the null set
(mathematics) of or comprising a value of precisely zero
(genetics, of a mutation) causing a complete loss of gene function, amorphic.
As nouns the difference between slops and null
is that slops is scraps that will be fed to animals, particularly to hogs while null is zero, nil; the cardinal number before einn.slops
English
Noun
(head)- I don't mind slopping the hogs, I just mind the stench of the slops .
- The original "slops " were voluminous breeches of about knee length, reminiscent of 17th century "", worn with stockings; these continue to be depicted as late as 1790s, but trousers, first introduced as slop-clothing in 1720s, were more functional and more popular.
- (A direct quote from: 1897 Universal Dictionary of the English Language , v 4 p 4310)
Synonyms
* slop, hogwash, swillnull
English
Noun
(en noun)- (Francis Bacon)
- Since no date of birth was entered for the patient, his age is null .
Adjective
(en adjective)- In proportion as we descend the social scale our snobbishness fastens on to mere nothings which are perhaps no more null than the distinctions observed by the aristocracy, but, being more obscure, more peculiar to the individual, take us more by surprise.