Ruling vs Antidisestablishmentarianism - What's the difference?
ruling | antidisestablishmentarianism |
That rules; predominant; chief; reigning; controlling.
A political philosophy opposed to the separation of a religious group ("church") and a government ("state"), especially the belief held by those in 19th century England opposed to separating the Anglican church from the civil government or to refer to separation of church and state.
* 1998 , University of Oklahoma College of Law, American Indian Law Review :
* 2002 , Angela Hague and David Lavery (credited as editors, but truly authors of the compiled fictional reviews), Teleparody: predicting/preventing the TV discourse of tomorrow
As nouns the difference between ruling and antidisestablishmentarianism
is that ruling is an order or a decision on a point of law from someone in authority while antidisestablishmentarianism is a political philosophy opposed to the separation of a religious group ("church") and a government ("state"), especially the belief held by those in 19th century england opposed to separating the anglican church from the civil government or to refer to separation of church and state.As an adjective ruling
is that rules; predominant; chief; reigning; controlling.As a verb ruling
is .ruling
English
Adjective
(head)- the ruling monarch
- a ruling passion
Synonyms
* governing * reigning (of a monarch ) * in power (of a government; used after the noun )Derived terms
* ruling gradientSynonyms
* commandment, edict, order, ruleVerb
(head)Anagrams
*antidisestablishmentarianism
English
(wikipedia antidisestablishmentarianism)Noun
(-)- Jed Rubenfeld, who actually may not have been recycling a Boerne Court- rejected argument into a law review article,450 reasoned that RFRA indeed lacked constitutionality, but because of First Amendment antidisestablishmentarianism , and not the reasons offered by the Court.451
- The establishmentarianism of Hatch's alliance-building strategy undermined by the disestablishmentarianism of Wiglesworth's treachery triggers an antidisestablishmentarianism' in Hawk — but the negation of Wiglesworth's 'dis' coupled with the counter-negation of Hawk's 'anti' does not simply generate a synthetic affirmation of Hatch's 'establishmentarianism'. Instead, Hawk's ' antidisestablishmentarianism , like a cancerous wart on the end of the nose, is perched at the fuzzy border separating ontology from oncology, malignity from malignancy.