Rheumatic vs Ruplizumab - What's the difference?
rheumatic | ruplizumab |
Resembling or relating to rheumatism.
Derived from, or having the character of, rheum; rheumic.
(rare) A person suffering from rheumatism
* 1890 , The American practitioner, Volumes 9-10?
* 1911 , George Knapp Abbott, Principles and practice of hydrotherapy
* {{quote-book, 1933, George Hoyt Bigelow & Herbert Luther Lombard, Cancer and Other Chronic Diseases in Massachusetts
, passage=The rheumatics in the survey who had complete disability had had this same disability for an average of two years.}}
A humanized monoclonal antibody intended for the treatment of rheumatic diseases.
As nouns the difference between rheumatic and ruplizumab
is that rheumatic is a person suffering from rheumatism while ruplizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody intended for the treatment of rheumatic diseases.As an adjective rheumatic
is resembling or relating to rheumatism.rheumatic
English
Adjective
(en adjective)Derived terms
* rheumatically * rheumatic feverNoun
(en noun)- It has been a clinical observation with me that the majority of chronic rheumatics are likewise the subjects of chronic constipation.
- It must, be confessed, however, that the majority of rheumatics are not able to stand such treatment.
citation