Reviewer vs Censor - What's the difference?
reviewer | censor | Related terms |
(history) A Roman magistrate, originally a census administrator, by Classical times a high judge of public behavior and morality
An official responsible for the removal of objectionable or sensitive content
One who censures or condemns
(psychology) A hypothetical subconscious agency which filters unacceptable thought before it reaches the conscious
(acronym ) Censors Ensure No Secrets Over Radios
To review in order to remove objectionable content from correspondence or public media, either by legal criteria or with discretionary powers
To remove objectionable content
Reviewer is a related term of censor.
As nouns the difference between reviewer and censor
is that reviewer is a person who writes critical reviews for a newspaper or other publication; a critic while censor is (history) a roman magistrate, originally a census administrator, by classical times a high judge of public behavior and morality.As a verb censor is
to review in order to remove objectionable content from correspondence or public media, either by legal criteria or with discretionary powers.reviewer
English
censor
English
Alternative forms
* censour (obsolete)Noun
(en noun)- The Ancient censors were part of the ''cursus honorum , a series of public offices held during a political career, like consuls and praetors.
- The headmaster is an even stricter censor''' for his boarding pupils' correspondence than the enemy ' censors had been for his own when the country was occupied.
Synonyms
* censurerVerb
(en verb)- The man responsible for censoring films has seen some things in his time.
- ''Occupying powers typically censor anything reeking of resistance