Represent vs Representamen - What's the difference?
represent | representamen | Related terms |
To present again or anew; to present by means of something standing in the place of; to exhibit the counterpart or image of; to typify.
To portray by pictorial or plastic art; to delineate; as, to represent a landscape in a picture, a horse in bronze, and the like.
To portray by mimicry or action of any kind; to act the part or character of; to personate; as, to represent Hamlet.
To stand in the place of; to supply the place, perform the duties, exercise the rights, or receive the share, of; to speak and act with authority in behalf of; to act the part of (another); as, an heir represents his ancestor; an attorney represents his client in court; a member of Congress represents his district in Congress.
To exhibit to another mind in language; to show; to give one's own impressions and judgement of; to bring before the mind; to set forth; sometimes, to give an account of; to describe.
To serve as a sign or symbol of; as, mathematical symbols represent quantities or relations; words represent ideas or things.
To bring a sensation of into the mind or sensorium; to cause to be known, felt, or apprehended; to present.
To form or image again in consciousness, as an object of cognition or apprehension (something presentative, which was originally apprehended by direct presentation).
(Webster 1913)
(rfc-def) A representation, a thing serving to represent something (as to an interpreting mind). It is a representation in the sense of something which represents'', as opposed to its ''operation or relation'' of representing, and also as opposed to a ''process or activity of representing, which produces it. (The produced representamen can itself seem or be a process or activity, for example a song or a theatrical performance, or a rock's tumbling in an informative way, or a logical argument).
* circa'' 1897 : [aut.] and Justus Buchler [ed.], ''Philosophical Writings of Peirce'', chapter 7: “Logic as Semiotic: The Theory of Signs”, § 1: “What is a Sign? Three Divisions of Logic”, page 99 (from a ''circa'' 1897 manuscript (''CP'' 2.227–9), first published in the 1940 selection ''The Philosophy of Peirce: Selected Writings'', and later reprinted ''sic in 1955 by Dover Publications, Inc., New York; ISBN 0486202178, 9780486202174)
* (William Hamilton)
Representamen is a related term of represent.
As a verb represent
is to present again or anew; to present by means of something standing in the place of; to exhibit the counterpart or image of; to typify.As a noun representamen is
a representation, a thing serving to represent something (as to an interpreting mind). It is a representation in the sense of something which represents, as opposed to its operation or relation of representing, and also as opposed to a process or activity of representing, which produces it. (The produced representamen can itself seem or be a process or activity, for example a song or a theatrical performance, or a rock's tumbling in an informative way, or a logical argument).represent
English
(Webster 1913)Alternative forms
* (archaic)Verb
(en verb)- He represented that he was investigating for the police department.
External links
* *Anagrams
*representamen
English
Noun
(en-noun)- A sign, or representamen , is something which stands to somebody for something in some respect or capacity.
Quotations
* "I confine the word representation'' to the operation of a sign or its ''relation'' to the object ''for'' the interpreter of the representation. The concrete subject that represents I call a sign or a ''representamen''." — , v. 1, paragraph 540.Eprint. * "Possibly there may be Representamens that are not Signs." — C. S. Peirce, "A Syllabus of Certain Topics of Logic", 1903, the v. 2, pp. 272-3.
Eprint. * "It is the science of what is quasi-necessarily true of the representamina of any scientific intelligence in order that they may hold good of any object, that is, may be true." — C. S. Peirce, Collected Papers v. 2, paragraph 229.
Eprint. * Four instances of "representamina" used by , Four Ages of Understanding (2001, U of Toronto Press), p. 726, Google Books limited preview
Eprint