Replacement vs Redintegration - What's the difference?
replacement | redintegration | Related terms |
A person or thing that takes the place of another; a substitute.
* {{quote-news
, year=2010
, date=December 28
, author=Kevin Darlin
, title=West Brom 1 - 3 Blackburn
, work=BBC
The act of replacing something.
(rare) Restoration to a whole or sound state.
(chemistry, obsolete) Restoration of a mixture to its former nature and state.
(psychology) The reinstatement of a memory upon the presentation of a stimulus element that was a part of the stimulus complex that had aroused the event.
* 1956–1960 , (second edition, 1960), chapter ii: “Motives and Motivation”, page 44:
* ibidem , page 48:
As nouns the difference between replacement and redintegration
is that replacement is a person or thing that takes the place of another; a substitute while redintegration is restoration to a whole or sound state.replacement
English
Noun
(en noun)citation, page= , passage=Rovers lost keeper Robinson to a calf problem at half-time and his replacement Mark Bunn, making his Premier League debut, was immediately called into action - pushing away a vicious Peter Odemwingie drive at the near post.}}
Synonyms
* See alsoDerived terms
* overreplacement * subreplacementSee also
* spare partredintegration
English
Noun
(en noun)- Now all this story might be true. But even if it were, it does not follow that reference to redintegration should be included as part of the definition of ‘motive’.
- Is McClelland’s concept of ‘motive’ yet another example of explanation masquerading as analysis? This is obviously so in his definition which includes the reference to redintegration of affect.