Redundancy vs Deadwood - What's the difference?
redundancy | deadwood |
The state of being redundant; a superfluity; something redundant or excessive; a needless repetition in language; excessive wordiness.
Duplication of components or circuits to provide survival of the total system in case of failure of single components.
* 2006 , Lauren Bean, Richard E. Friedman, Chapter 5: School Safety in the Twenty First Century: Adapting to New Security Challenges Post-9/11'', James J. F. Forest (editor), ''Homeland Security: Protecting America?s Targets , Volume 2: Public Spaces and Social Institutions,
Duplication of parts of a message to guard against transmission errors.
The state of being unemployed because one's job is no longer necessary; the dismissal of such an employee; a layoff.
* 1981 , New Zealand House of Representatives. Parliamentary Debates , Volume 442,
* 1983 , UK House of Commons, Papers by Command , Volume 40,
* 2003 , K. Brendow, Restructuring Estonia?s Oil Shale Industry: What Lessons from the Restructuring the Coal Industries in Central and Eastern Europe?'', '' ,
(label) surplusage inserted in a pleading which may be rejected by the court without impairing the validity of what remains.
coarse woody debris
people judged to be superfluous to an organization or project
money not realized by exiting a winning pump trade too early
As nouns the difference between redundancy and deadwood
is that redundancy is the state of being redundant; a superfluity; something redundant or excessive; a needless repetition in language; excessive wordiness while deadwood is coarse woody debris.redundancy
English
(wikipedia redundancy)Noun
(redundancies)page 108,
- Staff redundancy is needed in the event that a supervisor and key unit supervisors are not present or unable to act in an emergency.
page 4212,
- Has he received any representation from Air New Zealand management about redundancy' proposals for Air New Zealand staff; and, if so, do these proposals include ' redundancy agreements?
page lvi,
- The potential savings did not take into account once-and-for-all staff redundancy costs of £16.5 million and unspecified costs involved in increasing stock levels.
page 307,
- In Estonia, in addition, the ethnical aspects of staff redundancy programmes have to be taken into account.