Quim vs Null - What's the difference?
quim | null |
(vulgar, slang) The female genitalia; the vulva.
* 1879 , Anonymous, " No. 1:
* 1922 , James Joyce, Ulysses , page 938:
* 2005 , Margaret Carter, Maiden Flights (ISBN 1419952595), page 131:
(Ulster) Affectedly nice, prim.
(Ulster) Moving with ease and precision.
A non-existent or empty value or set of values.
Zero]] quantity of [[expression, expressions; nothing.
Something that has no force or meaning.
(computing) the ASCII or Unicode character (), represented by a zero value, that indicates no character and is sometimes used as a string terminator.
(computing) the attribute of an entity that has no valid value.
One of the beads in nulled work.
(statistics) null hypothesis
Having no validity, "null and void"
insignificant
* 1924 , Marcel Proust, Within a Budding Grove :
absent or non-existent
(mathematics) of the null set
(mathematics) of or comprising a value of precisely zero
(genetics, of a mutation) causing a complete loss of gene function, amorphic.
As nouns the difference between quim and null
is that quim is (vulgar|slang) the female genitalia; the vulva while null is zero, nil; the cardinal number before einn.As an adjective quim
is (ulster) affectedly nice, prim.quim
English
Etymology 1
Origin uncertain; perhaps an alteration of queme. The English Dialect Dictionary has a citation of "quim and cosh" from 1723 which it glosses as "intimate and familiar". Compare also quaint, cunt. Derivation from Welsh is sometimes suggested, but the OED notes that this is "unlikely on both semantic and phonological grounds".Noun
(en noun)- For one day, when amusing herself with this whim
- The carrot it snapped, and part stuck in her quim .
- Ho! What do I here behold? Were you brushing the cobwebs off a few quims ?
- Her quim grew wet, ready to welcome it.
Etymology 2
. Compare English (m).Adjective
See also
* (l)null
English
Noun
(en noun)- (Francis Bacon)
- Since no date of birth was entered for the patient, his age is null .
Adjective
(en adjective)- In proportion as we descend the social scale our snobbishness fastens on to mere nothings which are perhaps no more null than the distinctions observed by the aristocracy, but, being more obscure, more peculiar to the individual, take us more by surprise.
