Pasher vs Null - What's the difference?
pasher | null |
(Australia, and, New Zealand, slang) One who pashes (snogs, kisses).
* 2003 , , The Adventures of Barry Crocker: Bazza ,
* 2005 , , Youse Two ,
* 2009 , Andrew Cox, ''Settling for It'', Tamara Sheward, Jenny Valentish (editors), ''Your Mother Would Be Proud: True Tales of Mayhem and Misadventure , Allen & Unwin, Australia,
A non-existent or empty value or set of values.
Zero]] quantity of [[expression, expressions; nothing.
Something that has no force or meaning.
(computing) the ASCII or Unicode character (), represented by a zero value, that indicates no character and is sometimes used as a string terminator.
(computing) the attribute of an entity that has no valid value.
One of the beads in nulled work.
(statistics) null hypothesis
Having no validity, "null and void"
insignificant
* 1924 , Marcel Proust, Within a Budding Grove :
absent or non-existent
(mathematics) of the null set
(mathematics) of or comprising a value of precisely zero
(genetics, of a mutation) causing a complete loss of gene function, amorphic.
As nouns the difference between pasher and null
is that pasher is (australia|and|new zealand|slang) one who pashes (snogs, kisses) while null is zero, nil; the cardinal number before einn.pasher
English
Noun
(en noun)- My boyfriend is such a good pasher!
page 76,
- ‘And seeing you told me you?re such a good pasher , you can kiss me goodnight if you like.’
unnumbered page,
- Ms Fitzgibbon turned her attention back to the pashers , who had now separated. That didn?t last long. They were walking back to camp, holding hands.
page 407,
- Nevertheless, I was off and running and thereafter enjoyed a period as one of this country?s most promiscuous pashers . With a minimum of sweet-talk almost anyone could kiss me, I was so fucking easy.
Anagrams
*null
English
Noun
(en noun)- (Francis Bacon)
- Since no date of birth was entered for the patient, his age is null .
Adjective
(en adjective)- In proportion as we descend the social scale our snobbishness fastens on to mere nothings which are perhaps no more null than the distinctions observed by the aristocracy, but, being more obscure, more peculiar to the individual, take us more by surprise.