Obligation vs Irresponsible - What's the difference?
obligation | irresponsible |
The act of binding oneself by a social, legal, or moral tie to someone.
A social, legal, or moral requirement, duty, contract, or promise that compels someone to follow or avoid a particular course of action.
A course of action imposed by society, law, or conscience by which someone is bound or restricted.
(legal) A legal agreement stipulating a specified payment or action; the document containing such agreement.
* 1668 December 19, , “Mr.'' Alexander Seaton ''contra'' Menzies” in ''The Deci?ions of the Lords of Council & Se??ion I (Edinburgh, 1683),
Lacking a sense of responsibility; incapable of or not chargeable with responsibility; unable to respond to obligation.
Not responsible; not subject to responsibility; not to be held accountable, or called into question.
As nouns the difference between obligation and irresponsible
is that obligation is the act of binding oneself by a social, legal, or moral tie to someone while irresponsible is someone who is not responsible.As an adjective irresponsible is
lacking a sense of responsibility; incapable of or not chargeable with responsibility; unable to respond to obligation.obligation
English
(wikipedia obligation)Noun
(en noun)- X shall be entitled to subcontract its obligation to provide the Support Services. <
>
page 575
- The Pupil after his Pupillarity, had granted a Di?charge to one of the Co-tutors, which did extingui?h the whole Debt of that Co-tutor, and con?equently of all the re?t, they being all correi debendi , lyable by one individual Obligation , which cannot be Di?charged as to one, and ?tand as to all the re?t.
