Objection vs Procatalepsis - What's the difference?
objection | procatalepsis |
The act of objecting.
* {{quote-magazine, date=2013-06-07, author=
, volume=188, issue=26, page=6, magazine=(The Guardian Weekly)
, title= A statement expressing opposition, or a reason or cause for expressing opposition (generally followed by the adposition to ).
(legal) An official protest raised in a court of law during a legal trial over a violation of the rules of the court by the opposing party.
(rhetoric) A rhetorical exercise in which the speaker raises an objection to his own argument and then immediately answers it, in an attempt to strengthen the argument by dealing with possible counter-arguments.
(rhetoric) Rebuttal of anticipated objections.
(grammar) Left dislocation.
As nouns the difference between objection and procatalepsis
is that objection is the act of objecting while procatalepsis is (rhetoric) a rhetorical exercise in which the speaker raises an objection to his own argument and then immediately answers it, in an attempt to strengthen the argument by dealing with possible counter-arguments.objection
English
Noun
(en noun)Ed Pilkington
‘Killer robots’ should be banned in advance, UN told, passage=In his submission to the UN, [Christof] Heyns points to the experience of drones. Unmanned aerial vehicles were intended initially only for surveillance, and their use for offensive purposes was prohibited, yet once strategists realised their perceived advantages as a means of carrying out targeted killings, all objections were swept out of the way.}}