In lang=en terms the difference between supertrue and superfalse

is that supertrue is in supervaluationism, necessarily true regardless of the values of variables while superfalse is in supervaluationism, necessarily false regardless of the values of variables.

As a noun referent

is referee (person who gives a reference).

As an adjective irreferential is

(logic) lacking a referent.

As an adjective philosophical

is of, or pertaining to, philosophy.

As a noun epistemicism is

a philosophical position asserting that there are facts about the boundaries of a vague predicate (such as "is thin" or "is bald") which cannot be discovered.

Supertrue is a see also of supervaluationism.

In logic|lang=en terms the difference between supertrue and supervaluationism

is that supertrue is (logic) in supervaluationism, necessarily true regardless of the values of variables while supervaluationism is (logic) a semantics for dealing with irreferential singular terms and vagueness.

As an adjective supertrue

is (logic) in supervaluationism, necessarily true regardless of the values of variables.

As a noun supervaluationism is

(logic) a semantics for dealing with irreferential singular terms and vagueness.

In logic|lang=en terms the difference between supervaluationism and supertruth

is that supervaluationism is (logic) a semantics for dealing with irreferential singular terms and vagueness while supertruth is (logic) in supervaluationism, the quality of being supertrue.

As nouns the difference between supervaluationism and supertruth

is that supervaluationism is (logic) a semantics for dealing with irreferential singular terms and vagueness while supertruth is (logic) in supervaluationism, the quality of being supertrue.

In logic|lang=en terms the difference between supertrue and supertruth

is that supertrue is (logic) in supervaluationism, necessarily true regardless of the values of variables while supertruth is (logic) in supervaluationism, the quality of being supertrue.

As an adjective supertrue

is (logic) in supervaluationism, necessarily true regardless of the values of variables.

As a noun supertruth is

(logic) in supervaluationism, the quality of being supertrue.

As adjectives the difference between true and supertrue

is that true is (label) one of two states of a boolean variable; logic while supertrue is (logic) in supervaluationism, necessarily true regardless of the values of variables.

As a noun variable

is variable.

As an adjective supertrue is

(logic) in supervaluationism, necessarily true regardless of the values of variables.

In logic|lang=en terms the difference between irreferential and supervaluationism

is that irreferential is (logic) lacking a referent while supervaluationism is (logic) a semantics for dealing with irreferential singular terms and vagueness.

As an adjective irreferential

is (logic) lacking a referent.

As a noun supervaluationism is

(logic) a semantics for dealing with irreferential singular terms and vagueness.

As nouns the difference between vagueness and supervaluationism

is that vagueness is (uncountable) the condition of being unclear; vague while supervaluationism is (logic) a semantics for dealing with irreferential singular terms and vagueness.