Mot vs Vehicle - What's the difference?
mot | vehicle |
A witty remark; a witticism; a bon mot.
* N. Brit. Rev.
* 1970 , John Glassco, Memoirs of Montparnasse , New York 2007, p. 32:
(obsolete) A word or a motto; a device.
* Shakespeare
(obsolete) A note or brief strain on a bugle.
(slang, Irish English) A girl, woman or girlfriend, particularly in the Dublin area.
----
A conveyance; a device for carrying or transporting substances, objects or individuals.
* {{quote-book, year=2006, author=(Edwin Black)
, title= * {{quote-magazine, date=2013-06-29, volume=407, issue=8842, page=28, magazine=(The Economist)
, title= A medium for expression of talent or views.
A liquid content (e.g. oil) which acts as a binding and drying agent in paint. (FM 55-501).
An entity to achieve an end.
* {{quote-magazine, date=2013-06-07, author=
, volume=188, issue=26, page=6, magazine=(The Guardian Weekly)
, title= (Buddhism) A mode or method of spiritual practice; a yana.
(Hinduism) An animal or (rarely) a plant on which a Hindu deity rides or sits
As nouns the difference between mot and vehicle
is that mot is a witty remark; a witticism; a bon mot while vehicle is a conveyance; a device for carrying or transporting substances, objects or individuals.As a proper noun Mot
is canaanite god of death and the underworld.mot
English
Etymology 1
From (etyl) mot. Compare motto.Noun
(en noun)- Here and there turns up a savage mot .
- ‘He comes from Montreal, in Canada.’ ‘Why?’ she said, repeating Dr Johnson's mot with a forced sneer.
- (Bishop Hall)
- Tarquin's eye may read the mot afar.
- (Sir Walter Scott)
Etymology 2
Noun
(head)vehicle
English
(wikipedia vehicle)Noun
(en noun)Internal Combustion, chapter=1 , passage=But electric vehicles and the batteries that made them run became ensnared in corporate scandals, fraud, and monopolistic corruption that shook the confidence of the nation and inspired automotive upstarts.}}
High and wet, passage=Floods in northern India, mostly in the small state of Uttarakhand, have wrought disaster on an enormous scale.
Ed Pilkington
‘Killer robots’ should be banned in advance, UN told, passage=In his submission to the UN, [Christof] Heyns points to the experience of drones. Unmanned aerial vehicles were intended initially only for surveillance, and their use for offensive purposes was prohibited, yet once strategists realised their perceived advantages as a means of carrying out targeted killings, all objections were swept out of the way.}}
