Microhistory vs Macrohistory - What's the difference?
microhistory | macrohistory | Related terms |
(history) The study of the past on a small scale, such as an individual neighborhood or town, as a case study for general trends
*{{quote-news, year=2009, date=September 13, author=Daphne Merkin, title=Dame of the British Interior, work=New York Times
, passage=What is certain is that in “The Pattern in the Carpet,” Drabble eschews both chronology and raw autobiographical revelation for a more meandering approach that touches briefly on family pathology and private pain as it crisscrosses the centuries and unfolds the microhistory of jigsaw puzzles, an English invention, circa 1767. }}
A form of large-scale history dealing with large groups of cultures over very long time periods.
*{{quote-news, year=2008, date=March 16, author=Alexander Star, title=I Feel Good, work=New York Times
, passage=These days, it’s chiefly nonhistorians like Jared Diamond and Tim Flannery who seek to trace the long arc of the species and write macrohistory in a scientific key. }}
Macrohistory is a related term of microhistory.
As nouns the difference between microhistory and macrohistory
is that microhistory is the study of the past on a small scale, such as an individual neighborhood or town, as a case study for general trends while macrohistory is a form of large-scale history dealing with large groups of cultures over very long time periods.microhistory
English
Noun
citation
Derived terms
*microhistorian *microhistorical *microhistoricallymacrohistory
English
Noun
citation
