Octopus vs Lusca - What's the difference?
As a proper noun octopus
As a noun lusca is
a folkloric sea monster of the caribbean resembling a giant octopus.
(see usage notes)
Any of several marine molluscs/mollusks, of the family '', having no internal or external protective shell or bone (unlike the nautilus, squid or cuttlefish) and eight arms each covered with suckers.
(uncountable) The flesh of these marine molluscs eaten as food.
An organization that has many powerful branches controlled from the centre.
The plural octopi is hypercorrect, coming from the mistaken notion that the (term
) in . The plural octopii is based on an incorrect attempt to pluralise the word based on an incorrect assumption of its origin, and is rare and widely considered to be nonstandard.
Sources differ on which plurals are acceptable: (w, Fowler's Modern English Usage)'' asserts that “the only acceptable plural in English is octopuses”, while (Merriam-Webster) and other dictionaries accept (term) as a plural form. The ''(Oxford English Dictionary)
), and (term
) (the order reflecting decreasing frequency of use), stating that the last form is rare.
The term octopod (either plural octopods and octopodes can be found) is taken from the taxonomic order Octopoda but has no classical equivalent, and is not necessarily synonymous (it can encompass any member of that order). The collective form (term
) is usually reserved for animals consumed for food.
A folkloric sea monster of the Caribbean resembling a giant octopus.
* 1970 , National Geographic
* 1999 , Robert Forrest Burgess, The Cave Divers
- The lusca , he said, was a terrible creature, like a monstrous octopus or cuttlefish.
* 2008 , Ryan Ver Berkmoes, Amy C Balfour, Paul Clammer, Michael Grosberg, Caribbean Islands
- For the same lusca had attacked his boat only a few weeks later.
- ...or the half-dragon, half-octopus Lusca , which whirlpools its victims to a watery death.