Jamming vs Clutter - What's the difference?
jamming | clutter |
(slang) Great; awesome.
* 2006 , Cupcake Brown, A piece of cake
A confused disordered jumble of things.
* L'Estrange
*{{quote-magazine, year=2013, month=May-June, author=
, title= (obsolete) Clatter; confused noise.
Background echos, from clouds etc., on a radar or sonar screen.
(countable) A group of cats;
* 2008 , John Robert Colombo, The Big Book of Canadian Ghost Stories , Introduction
To fill something with .
*{{quote-magazine, title=No hiding place
, date=2013-05-25, volume=407, issue=8837, page=74, magazine=(The Economist)
(obsolete) To clot or coagulate, like blood.
To make a confused noise; to bustle.
* Tennyson
As verbs the difference between jamming and clutter
is that jamming is while clutter is to fill something with.As nouns the difference between jamming and clutter
is that jamming is the act or process of jamming while clutter is a confused disordered jumble of things.As an adjective jamming
is (slang) great; awesome.jamming
English
(wikipedia jamming)Verb
(head)Adjective
(en adjective)- All I knew was it sho was a jamming party!
clutter
English
Noun
(-)- He saw what a clutter there was with huge, overgrown pots, pans, and spits.
William E. Conner
An Acoustic Arms Race, volume=101, issue=3, page=206-7, magazine=(American Scientist) , passage=Nonetheless, some insect prey take advantage of clutter' by hiding in it. Earless ghost swift moths become “invisible” to echolocating bats by forming mating clusters close (less than half a meter) above vegetation and effectively blending into the ' clutter of echoes that the bat receives from the leaves and stems around them.}}
- (Jonathan Swift)
- Organizing ghost stories is like herding a clutter of cats: the phenomenon resists organization and classification.
Derived terms
* surface clutter * volume clutterVerb
(en verb)citation, passage=In America alone, people spent $170 billion on “direct marketing”—junk mail of both the physical and electronic varieties—last year. Yet of those who received unsolicited adverts through the post, only 3% bought anything as a result. If the bumf arrived electronically, the take-up rate was 0.1%. And for online adverts the “conversion” into sales was a minuscule 0.01%. That means about $165 billion was spent not on drumming up business, but on annoying people, creating landfill and cluttering spam filters.}}
- (Holland)
- It [the goose] cluttered here, it chuckled there.