Infect vs Infeft - What's the difference?
infect | infeft |
To bring into contact with a substance that causes illness (a pathogen).
* {{quote-magazine, year=2013, month=May-June, author=
, title= To make somebody enthusiastic about one's own passion.
(obsolete) Infected.
* 1602 , , I. iii. 187:
* 1843 , '', book 2, chapter XII, ''The Abbot’s Troubles
* 1885 ,
:* {{quote-book
, year=1980
, year_published=2008
, edition=Digitized
, editor=
, author=Ann Morton, Gordon Donaldson
, title=British National Archives and the Local Historian
, chapter=
As verbs the difference between infect and infeft
is that infect is to bring into contact with a substance that causes illness (a pathogen) while infeft is past participle of infeoff.As an adjective infect
is infected.infect
English
Verb
(en verb)Katie L. Burke
In the News, volume=101, issue=3, page=193, magazine=(American Scientist) , passage=Bats host many high-profile viruses that can infect humans, including severe acute respiratory syndrome and Ebola.}}
Antonyms
* disinfectDerived terms
* infection * infectibleAdjective
(-)- And in the imitation of these twain, / Who, as Ulysses says, opinion crowns / With an imperial voice, many are infect .
infeft
English
Verb
(head)- he alleged farther that his predecessors had been infeft , at the Conquest, in the lands of Alfric son of Wisgar, who was Lord of by all persons.
- […] while a minor he received a dispensation and special license from the king, dated 8 Jan. 1608, upon which by a precept from chancery he was infeft in all the lands possessed by his father on 26, 27, 28 and 29 April.
citation, genre= , publisher=Historical Association , isbn= , page= , passage=Not only had a vassal to be infeft' when a grant was made or confirmed: a successor had to be ' infeft when he took up his inheritance. }}