Immutable vs Necessarianism - What's the difference?
immutable | necessarianism |
Unable to be changed without exception.
(programming, of a variable) Not able to be altered in the memory after its value is set initially, such as a constant.
(philosophy, metaphysics, theology) An extreme form of determinism that holds that all phenomena, including the will, are subject to immutable rules of cause and effect; necessitarianism.
* 1995 , Denis G. Paz, Nineteenth-Century English Religious Traditions: Retrospect and Prospect ,
* 2000 , R. K. Webb, 6: Miracles in Englsh Unitarian Thought'', Mark S. Micale, Robert L. Dietle (editors), ''Enlightenment, Passion, Modernity: Historical Essays in European Thought and Culture ,
* 2001 , Alexander Crombie, An Essay on Philosophical Necessity ,
As nouns the difference between immutable and necessarianism
is that immutable is something that cannot be changed while necessarianism is an extreme form of determinism that holds that all phenomena, including the will, are subject to immutable rules of cause and effect; necessitarianism.As an adjective immutable
is unable to be changed without exception.immutable
English
Adjective
(-)- The government has enacted an immutable law.
Antonyms
* mutable * nonimmutableDerived terms
* strongly immutable * weakly immutableAnagrams
* ----necessarianism
English
Noun
(-)page 106,
- Scholars working on Joseph Priestley have begun to take a proper measure of his philosophical position, known as “necessarianism',” a psychological determinism based on the teachings of the midcentury physician and theologian David Hartley—with, in Priestley?s own case, the addition of materialism. To its enemies, ' necessarianism seemed rank fatalism, but its adherents found that it both explained the evils about them and offered a sovereign remedy (generally through one or another variety of education) to resolve them and bring mankind to perfection.
page 114,
- While not acceptable to all Unitarians, the philosophical determinism known as Necessarianism , identified with Hartley and Priestley, also proved persuasive to many, both ministers and laymen.
page number not shown,
- To cut a long story short, this led to the emergence of a new form of necessarianism'. People are conditioned to behave as they do, so freedom is an illusion. This form of '''necessarianism''' may be called ‘behaviourist ' necessarianism ’.
