Imagination vs Innovation - What's the difference?
imagination | innovation |
The image-making power of the mind; the act of creating or reproducing ideally an object not previously perceived; the ability to create such images.
* {{quote-book, year=1913, author=
, title=Lord Stranleigh Abroad
, chapter=5 Particularly, construction of false images; fantasizing.
Creativity; resourcefulness.
A mental image formed by the action of the imagination as a faculty; a conception; a notion; an imagining; something imagined.
* 1597 , Francis Bacon, "Of Youth and Age", Essays :
The act of innovating; the introduction of something new, in customs, rites, etc.
* {{quote-magazine, date=2013-06-21, author=
, volume=189, issue=2, page=10, magazine=(The Guardian Weekly)
, title= *
A change effected by innovating; a change in customs;
Something new, and contrary to established customs, manners, or rites.
A newly formed shoot, or the annually produced addition to the stems of many mosses.
As nouns the difference between imagination and innovation
is that imagination is the image-making power of the mind; the act of creating or reproducing ideally an object not previously perceived; the ability to create such images while innovation is the act of innovating; the introduction of something new, in customs, rites, etc.imagination
English
Noun
(en noun)- Imagination is one of the most advanced human faculties.
citation, passage=She removed Stranleigh’s coat with a dexterity that aroused his imagination .}}
- You think someone's been following you? That's just your imagination .
- His imagination makes him a valuable team member.
- And yet the invention of young men, is more lively than that of old; and imaginations stream into their minds better, and, as it were, more divinely.
Synonyms
* (the representative power) creativity, fancy, imaginativeness, invention, inventivenessExternal links
* (wikipedia "imagination") ----innovation
English
Noun
(en noun)Karen McVeigh
US rules human genes can't be patented, passage=The US supreme court has ruled unanimously that natural human genes cannot be patented, a decision that scientists and civil rights campaigners said removed a major barrier to patient care and medical innovation .}}