Flyer vs Null - What's the difference?
flyer | null |
A machine that flies.
Someone who pilots or rides in an airplane.
A leaflet, often for advertising.
The part of a spinning machine that twists the thread as it takes it to, and winds it on the bobbin
(architecture) An arch that connects a flying buttress into the structure it supports.
(cheerleading) A cheerleader who is airborne for a stunt.
(firearms) a stray shot away from the group on a target.
A standard rectangular step of a staircase (as opposed to a winder).
A female kangaroo; a roo; a doe; a jill.
A leap or jump.
A risky investment or other venture.
To distribute flyers (leaflets).
To distribute flyers in (a location) or to (recipients).
A non-existent or empty value or set of values.
Zero]] quantity of [[expression, expressions; nothing.
Something that has no force or meaning.
(computing) the ASCII or Unicode character (), represented by a zero value, that indicates no character and is sometimes used as a string terminator.
(computing) the attribute of an entity that has no valid value.
One of the beads in nulled work.
(statistics) null hypothesis
Having no validity, "null and void"
insignificant
* 1924 , Marcel Proust, Within a Budding Grove :
absent or non-existent
(mathematics) of the null set
(mathematics) of or comprising a value of precisely zero
(genetics, of a mutation) causing a complete loss of gene function, amorphic.
As nouns the difference between flyer and null
is that flyer is a machine that flies while null is zero, nil; the cardinal number before einn.As a verb flyer
is to distribute flyers (leaflets).flyer
English
Alternative forms
* flierNoun
(en noun)Synonyms
* (pilot) aviator, aviatrixDerived terms
* take a flyerVerb
(en verb)See also
* advertisement * booklet * brochure * catalogue, catalog * circular * handbill * junk mail * leaflet * pamphletAnagrams
*null
English
Noun
(en noun)- (Francis Bacon)
- Since no date of birth was entered for the patient, his age is null .
Adjective
(en adjective)- In proportion as we descend the social scale our snobbishness fastens on to mere nothings which are perhaps no more null than the distinctions observed by the aristocracy, but, being more obscure, more peculiar to the individual, take us more by surprise.