Feat vs Null - What's the difference?
feat | null |
A relatively rare or difficult accomplishment.
* {{quote-news
, year=2013
, date=January 22
, author=Phil McNulty
, title=Aston Villa 2-1 Bradford (3-4)
, work=BBC
(archaic) dexterous in movements or service; skilful; neat; pretty
* Shakespeare
* 1610 , , act 2 scene 1
(obsolete) To form; to fashion.
* Shakespeare
A non-existent or empty value or set of values.
Zero]] quantity of [[expression, expressions; nothing.
Something that has no force or meaning.
(computing) the ASCII or Unicode character (), represented by a zero value, that indicates no character and is sometimes used as a string terminator.
(computing) the attribute of an entity that has no valid value.
One of the beads in nulled work.
(statistics) null hypothesis
Having no validity, "null and void"
insignificant
* 1924 , Marcel Proust, Within a Budding Grove :
absent or non-existent
(mathematics) of the null set
(mathematics) of or comprising a value of precisely zero
(genetics, of a mutation) causing a complete loss of gene function, amorphic.
As nouns the difference between feat and null
is that feat is a relatively rare or difficult accomplishment while null is zero, nil; the cardinal number before einn.As an adjective feat
is (archaic) dexterous in movements or service; skilful; neat; pretty.As a verb feat
is (obsolete) to form; to fashion.feat
English
Noun
(en noun)citation, page= , passage=Bradford may have lost on the night but they stubbornly protected a 3-1 first-leg advantage to emulate a feat last achieved by Rochdale in 1962.}}
Derived terms
* no small feat * no mean featAdjective
(er)- Never master had a page so feat .
- And look how well my garments sit upon me — / Much feater than before.
Verb
(en verb)- To the more mature, / A glass that feated them.
Anagrams
* * * *null
English
Noun
(en noun)- (Francis Bacon)
- Since no date of birth was entered for the patient, his age is null .
Adjective
(en adjective)- In proportion as we descend the social scale our snobbishness fastens on to mere nothings which are perhaps no more null than the distinctions observed by the aristocracy, but, being more obscure, more peculiar to the individual, take us more by surprise.