Experienced vs Unexperienceable - What's the difference?
experienced | unexperienceable |
Having experience and skill in a subject.
* {{quote-book, year=1963, author=(Margery Allingham), title=(The China Governess)
, chapter=20 Experient.
(chiefly, philosophy) Incapable of being experienced.
* 1912 , W. P. Montague, "The New Realism and the Old," The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods , vol. 9, no. 2 (Jan. 18) , p. 45:
* 2000 , Kevin Schilbrack, "Metaphysics in D?gen," Philosophy East and West , vol. 50, no. 1 (Jan), p. 53 n61:
As adjectives the difference between experienced and unexperienceable
is that experienced is having experience and skill in a subject while unexperienceable is (chiefly|philosophy) incapable of being experienced.As a verb experienced
is .experienced
English
Adjective
(en adjective)citation, passage=The story struck the depressingly familiar note with which true stories ring in the tried ears of experienced policemen. No one queried it. It was in the classic pattern of human weakness, mean and embarrassing and sad.}}
Antonyms
* inexperienced * greenVerb
(head)unexperienceable
English
Adjective
(-)- It is at the cost of making the absolute unknowable, of reducing it to the status of the unexperienceable external world of the dualistic realist.
- It is beyond logic, an inconceivable but not unexperienceable unity of opposites.