Epistemic vs Undefined - What's the difference?
epistemic | undefined |
Of or relating to knowledge or cognition; cognitive.
* 1981 , Martin Warner, “Review of Metaphor and Thought'' by Andrew Ortony”, ''The Modern Language Review , vol. 76, no. 2, p. 428,
* {{quote-web
, year = 2008
, author = Paul Vincent Spade
, title = Medieval Theories of Obligationes
, site = Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
, url = http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/obligationes/
, accessdate = 2012-07-15
}}
(rare) Of or relating to theory of knowledge (epistemology).
* 2000 , Timm Triplett, “Review of The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm''”, ''The Philosophical Review , vol. 109, no. 3, p. 452,
Lacking a definition or value.
(mathematics, computing) That does not have a meaning and is thus not assigned an interpretation.
As adjectives the difference between epistemic and undefined
is that epistemic is of or relating to knowledge or cognition; cognitive while undefined is lacking a definition or value.epistemic
English
Adjective
(-)- Metaphors provide epistemic access to the world via the articulation of new ideas at a stage when literal language cannot cope.
- Second, note the role of the respondent's epistemic state. It is a factor in determining the correct replies, but only when the propositum is irrelevant.
- Audi considers whether Chisholm might be able to incorporate into his epistemic system an internalist evidential grounding requirement.
Usage notes
Philosophers usually differentiate the meanings of “epistemic” and “epistemological”. They generally use “epistemic” in the sense “of or relating to knowledge or cognition” and use “epistemological” in the sense “of or relating to epistemology”. [citation needed]Derived terms
* epistemic logic * epistemicallyundefined
English
Adjective
(wikipedia undefined) (-)- The result of division by zero is undefined .
