Emphatic vs Unqualified - What's the difference?
emphatic | unqualified | Synonyms |
Characterized by emphasis.
* {{quote-news
, year=2012
, date=June 28
, author=Jamie Jackson
, title=Wimbledon 2012: Lukas Rosol shocked by miracle win over Rafael Nadal
, work=the Guardian
Stated with conviction.
belonging to set of English tense forms comprising the auxiliary verb do + an infinitive without to
(phonology) of obstruent consonants in Semitic languages.
Not qualified, ineligible, unfit for a position or task.
Not elaborated upon, undescribed.
As adjectives the difference between emphatic and unqualified
is that emphatic is characterized by emphasis while unqualified is not qualified, ineligible, unfit for a position or task.As a noun emphatic
is an emphatic consonant.emphatic
English
Alternative forms
* emphatick (obsolete)Adjective
(en adjective)citation, page= , passage=Yet when play restarted the Czech was a train that kept on running over Nadal. After breaking Nadal in the opening game of the final set, he went 2-0 up and later took the count to 4-2 with yet another emphatic ace – one of his 22 throughout.}}
- He gave me an emphatic no when I asked him out.
Derived terms
* emphaticallySee also
* phaticAnagrams
*unqualified
English
Adjective
(en adjective)- His lack of a high school diploma renders him unqualified for the job.
- Her cooking ability, while mentioned, was unqualified by her.