What's the difference between
and
Enter two words to compare and contrast their definitions, origins, and synonyms to better understand how those words are related.

Ekstases vs Ekstasis - What's the difference?

ekstases | ekstasis |

As nouns the difference between ekstases and ekstasis

is that ekstases is while ekstasis is (mysticism|philosophy) the state of being beside one's self or rapt out of one's self.

ekstases

English

Noun

(head)
  • ekstasis

    Alternative forms

    * ecstasis

    Noun

    (ekstases)
  • (mysticism, philosophy) The state of being beside one's self or rapt out of one's self.
  • * [1914], 1995, Holden E Sampson, The True Mystic [http://books.google.com/books?ie=UTF-8&hl=en&id=Qqm7RQvTQ3sC&pg=PA28&lpg=PA28&sig=5lVGuxEcsuYip2s9t2xgSTWp4nc]
  • In Psychics the strange phenomenon of “Katalepsis” experienced by developed “trance-mediumship” bears so close a resemblance, physically, to Ekstasis , that the two are often taken for one and the same thing.
  • * 1918, Holden Edward Sampson, Theou Sophia [http://books.google.com/books?ie=UTF-8&hl=en&id=Ngm1fKwefZkC&pg=PA271&lpg=PA271&sig=No3CTw_YWFZF6a8U2Gv-m_ep7HY]
  • In no wise is it possible for the State of Ekstasis' to be attained by Mankind except as the prelude to Initiation in the Divine Mysteries. When the Initiations have been fully accomplished, to the Seventh Golden Gate, there is no further need for the Processes requisite to induce the State of ' Ekstasis .
  • * 1956, Jean-Paul Sartre, Being and Nothingness, Hazel E. Barnes tr. [http://print.google.com/print?id=X6RtpboH478C&pg=PA44&lpg=PA44&sig=rn7rLG6wKdO9yu4tCE59PKCfITg]
  • We find ourselves then in the presence of two human ekstases': the '''ekstasis''' which throws us into being-in-itself and the ' ekstasis which engages us in non-being.
  • * 1984, Martin Heidegger, The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, Michael Heim tr. [http://books.google.com/books?ie=UTF-8&hl=en&id=NpLPePqZYwEC&pg=PA205&lpg=PA205&sig=nSQ8gNAY1Suydht0UlO4ct8piN0]
  • Conversely, expecting is, as we say, ecstatic. The ecstasy mentioned here, stepping out itself (????????) is to some extent a raptus [rapture]. [...] And we therefore call these three basic phenomena the ecstases of temporality.
  • * 1994, Jacques Derrida, Politiques de lamitié (The Politics of Friendship), George Collins, trans. Verso, 2005. p.73.
  • This is a double but infinite responsibility, infinitely redoubled, split in two (dé-doublée ), shared and parcelled out; an infinitely divided responsibility, dissemintated, if you will, for one person, for only one---all alone (this is the condition of responsibility)---and a bottomless double responsibility that implicitly describes an intertwining of temporal ekstases ; a friendship to come of time with itself where we meet again the interlacing of the sameand the altogether other ('Grundlick-Anderes') which orientates us in this labyrinth.
  • * 2002, Angela Dalle Vacche, “Unexplored Connections in a New Territory,” in The Visual Turn, Angela Dalle Vacche ed. [http://books.google.com/books?ie=UTF-8&hl=en&id=mrxLuyQ1GjYC&pg=PA21&lpg=PA21&sig=LX0CsBvZonTHzR-w7F2suuDhwck]
  • Eisenstein’s discussion of Serov’s portrait associates ekstasis' with an “expulsion of meaning.” By contrast, the filmmaker’s handling of Vasily Surikov’s large canvas, ''La Bojara Morozova'' (1887), is an example of ' ekstasis as expressive conversion from the visual to the acoustic.