Ecumenical vs Transpartisan - What's the difference?
ecumenical | transpartisan |
(ecclesiastical) Pertaining to the universal Church, representing the entire Christian world; interdenominational; sometimes by extension, interreligious.
* 1999 , Dr Martyn Percy, The Guardian , 5 Jun 1999:
* 2009 , (Diarmaid MacCulloch), A History of Christianity , Penguin 2010, p. 215:
* 2010 , ‘Britain's ancient shame in Slovenia’, The Economist , 30 Oct 2010:
General, universal, worldwide.
(politics) Going beyond the partisan; ecumenical, universal.
*1989 , Hans Daalder, Galen A Irwin, Politics in the Netherlands: How Much Change?
*:As a matter of fact, it was national or transpartisan policy and stood outside daily political controversies.
*2008 , Marcia Ford, We the Purple: Faith, Politics, and the Independent Voter
*:Through transpartisan dialogue — and simply getting to know each other as human beings — people began to shed their biases and preconceptions.
As adjectives the difference between ecumenical and transpartisan
is that ecumenical is (ecclesiastical) pertaining to the universal church, representing the entire christian world; interdenominational; sometimes by extension, interreligious while transpartisan is (politics) going beyond the partisan; ecumenical, universal.ecumenical
English
Alternative forms
* * oecumenicalAdjective
(-)- Within Europe, the church's ecumenical partnerships have demonstrated that ecclesial unity may have political resonances.
- Nicaea has always been regarded as one of the milestones in the history of the Church, and reckoned as the first council to be styled ‘general’ or ‘oecumenical ’.
- Rather touchingly, an ecumenical mass of reparation for the victims of the massacres was held on October 29, in the very English village of Great Missenden in Buckinghamshire. The service was led by the Catholic bishop of Northampton, with Archbishop Metropolitan Stres from Ljubljana and the Anglican bishop of Buckingham.