Diffidence vs Null - What's the difference?
diffidence | null |
The state of being diffident, timid or shy; reticence or self-effacement.
* 1857 , Brigham Young, Journal of Discources'', ''
* 1897 , '' (an excerpt from ''Sotileza )
(obsolete) Mistrust, distrust, lack of confidence in someone or something.
* 1591 , William Shakespeare, , act 3 scene 3
A non-existent or empty value or set of values.
Zero]] quantity of [[expression, expressions; nothing.
Something that has no force or meaning.
(computing) the ASCII or Unicode character (), represented by a zero value, that indicates no character and is sometimes used as a string terminator.
(computing) the attribute of an entity that has no valid value.
One of the beads in nulled work.
(statistics) null hypothesis
Having no validity, "null and void"
insignificant
* 1924 , Marcel Proust, Within a Budding Grove :
absent or non-existent
(mathematics) of the null set
(mathematics) of or comprising a value of precisely zero
(genetics, of a mutation) causing a complete loss of gene function, amorphic.
As nouns the difference between diffidence and null
is that diffidence is the state of being diffident, timid or shy; reticence or self-effacement while null is zero, nil; the cardinal number before einn.diffidence
English
Noun
(-)- I have the same diffidence in my feelings that most public speakers have, and am apt to think that others can speak better and more edifying than I can.
- "I was passing by," he began to stammer, trembling with his diffidence , "I—happened to be passing along this way, and so—er—as I was passing this way, I says to myself, says I, 'I'll just stop into the shop a minute.'
- [Charles, King of France]: We have been guided by thee hitherto,
- And of thy cunning had no diffidence :
- One sudden foil shall never breed distrust.
null
English
Noun
(en noun)- (Francis Bacon)
- Since no date of birth was entered for the patient, his age is null .
Adjective
(en adjective)- In proportion as we descend the social scale our snobbishness fastens on to mere nothings which are perhaps no more null than the distinctions observed by the aristocracy, but, being more obscure, more peculiar to the individual, take us more by surprise.