Countenance vs Succor - What's the difference?
countenance | succor | Related terms |
Appearance, especially the features and expression of the face.
* , Genesis 4:5
*{{quote-book, year=1959, author=(Georgette Heyer), title=(The Unknown Ajax), chapter=1
, passage=But Richmond, his grandfather's darling, after one thoughtful glance cast under his lashes at that uncompromising countenance appeared to lose himself in his own reflections.}}
Favour; support; encouragement.
* (Bible), (Psalms) xxi. 6
* (Francis Atterbury) (1663-1732)
(label) Superficial appearance; show; pretense.
* (Roger Ascham) (1515-1568)
To tolerate, support, sanction, patronise or approve of something.
* 1925 , Franz Kafka, The Trial'', ''Vintage Books (London) , pg. 99:
Aid, assistance or relief given to one in distress; ministration.
Countenance is a related term of succor.
In lang=en terms the difference between countenance and succor
is that countenance is to tolerate, support, sanction, patronise or approve of something while succor is to give such assistance.As nouns the difference between countenance and succor
is that countenance is appearance, especially the features and expression of the face while succor is aid, assistance or relief given to one in distress; ministration.As verbs the difference between countenance and succor
is that countenance is to tolerate, support, sanction, patronise or approve of something while succor is to give such assistance.countenance
English
Alternative forms
* countenaunce (obsolete)Noun
(en noun)- But unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect. And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell.
- Thou hast made himglad with thy countenance .
- This is the magistrate's peculiar province, to give countenance to piety and virtue, and to rebuke vice.
- The election being done, he made countenance of great discontent thereat.
Synonyms
* See alsoVerb
(countenanc)- ''The cruel punishment was countenanced by the government, although it was not officially legal.
- For the Defence was not actually countenanced by the Law, but only tolerated, and there were differences of opinion even on that point, whether the Law could be interpreted to admit such tolerances at all.