Correspondent vs Correlative - What's the difference?
correspondent | correlative | Related terms |
Corresponding; suitable; adapted; congruous.
* Hooker
(with to or with) Conforming; obedient.
* 1610 , , act 1 scene 2
Someone who or something which corresponds.
A journalist who sends reports to his newspaper or radio or television station from a distant or overseas location.
mutually related; corresponding
* '>citation
Either of two correlative things.
(grammar) A pro-form; a non-personal pronominal, proadjectival, or proadverbal form, in Esperanto regularly formed, indicating 'which?', 'that', 'some', 'none', and 'every', as applied to people, things, type, place, manner, reason, time, or quantity, as: kiu'' ‘who’ (which person?), ''iu'' ‘someone’ (some person), ''tie'' ‘there’ (that place), '' ‘everywhere’ (all places), etc.
Correspondent is a related term of correlative.
As adjectives the difference between correspondent and correlative
is that correspondent is corresponding; suitable; adapted; congruous while correlative is .As a noun correspondent
is someone who or something which corresponds.correspondent
English
Adjective
(en adjective)- Action correspondent or repugnant unto the law.
- : Pardon, master: / I will be correspondent to command, / And do my spriting gently.
Noun
(en noun)Derived terms
* correspondential * correspondently * correspondentship * foreign correspondentHyponyms
* stringerSee also
* corespondent * in WikipediaReferences
* ----correlative
English
Adjective
(en adjective)- If we reinterpret these phenomena in terms of a consistently
game-playing model of behavior, the need to distinguish be-
tween primary and secondary gains disappears. The correla-
tive necessity to estimate the relative significance of physio-
logical needs and dammed-up impulses on the one hand, and
of social and interpersonal factors on the other, also vanishes.
Since needs and impulses cannot be said to exist in human
social life without specified rules for dealing with them, in-
stinctual needs cannot be considered solely in terms of biologi-
cal rules, but must also be viewed in terms of their psycho-
social significance—that is, as parts of the game.
