Conventional vs Revolutionary - What's the difference?
conventional | revolutionary |
Pertaining to a convention, as in following generally accepted principles, methods and behaviour.
* {{quote-magazine, date=2013-06-01, volume=407, issue=8838
, page=13 (Technology Quarterly), magazine=(The Economist)
, title= Ordinary, commonplace.
* {{quote-book, year=1922, author=(Ben Travers), title=(A Cuckoo in the Nest)
, chapter=2 * 1980 , (Carl Sagan), Cosmos: A Personal Voyage ,
Banal]], trite, hackneyed, unoriginal or [[clichéd.
(finance) A conventional gilt-edged security, a kind of bond paying the holder a fixed cash payment (or coupon) every six months until maturity, at which point the holder receives the final payment and the return of the principal.
Of or pertaining to a revolution in government; tending to, or promoting, revolution; as, revolutionary war; revolutionary measures; revolutionary agitators.
(advertising) pertaining to something that portends of great change; overthrowing a standing mindset
(sciences) pertaining to something that revolves
A revolutionist; a person who revolts.
As adjectives the difference between conventional and revolutionary
is that conventional is pertaining to a convention, as in following generally accepted principles, methods and behaviour while revolutionary is of or pertaining to a revolution in government; tending to, or promoting, revolution; as, revolutionary war; revolutionary measures; revolutionary agitators.As nouns the difference between conventional and revolutionary
is that conventional is a conventional gilt-edged security, a kind of bond paying the holder a fixed cash payment (or coupon) every six months until maturity, at which point the holder receives the final payment and the return of the principal while revolutionary is a revolutionist; a person who revolts.conventional
English
Adjective
(en adjective)Ideas coming down the track, passage=A “moving platform” scheme
citation, passage=Mother
- The history of our study of our solar system shows us clearly that accepted and conventional ideas are often wrong, and that fundamental insights can arise from the most unexpected sources.