Clench vs Null - What's the difference?
clench | null |
Tight grip.
(engineering) A seal that is applied to formed thin-wall bushings.
A local chapter of the (Church of the SubGenius) parody religion.
* 1989 , Ted Schultz, The Fringes of Reason (page 210)
* 2003 , Peter Knight, Conspiracy Theories in American History: An Encyclopedia (page 170)
* 2012 , George D. Chryssides, Historical Dictionary of New Religious Movements (page 95)
To squeeze; to grip or hold tightly.
To move two parts of something against each other
A non-existent or empty value or set of values.
Zero]] quantity of [[expression, expressions; nothing.
Something that has no force or meaning.
(computing) the ASCII or Unicode character (), represented by a zero value, that indicates no character and is sometimes used as a string terminator.
(computing) the attribute of an entity that has no valid value.
One of the beads in nulled work.
(statistics) null hypothesis
Having no validity, "null and void"
insignificant
* 1924 , Marcel Proust, Within a Budding Grove :
absent or non-existent
(mathematics) of the null set
(mathematics) of or comprising a value of precisely zero
(genetics, of a mutation) causing a complete loss of gene function, amorphic.
As nouns the difference between clench and null
is that clench is tight grip while null is zero, nil; the cardinal number before einn.As a verb clench
is to squeeze; to grip or hold tightly.clench
English
Noun
(es)- And perhaps most innovative of all, Drummond and Stang pushed for a policy of clench autonomy
- Every SubGenius clench is required to have a member who does not believe
- Originality is encouraged, and some clenches have devised their own distinctive organizational names
Verb
(es)- He clenched his fist in anger.
- Bruxism is clenching the jaws.
Synonyms
* clasp * clutchAntonyms
* unclenchnull
English
Noun
(en noun)- (Francis Bacon)
- Since no date of birth was entered for the patient, his age is null .
Adjective
(en adjective)- In proportion as we descend the social scale our snobbishness fastens on to mere nothings which are perhaps no more null than the distinctions observed by the aristocracy, but, being more obscure, more peculiar to the individual, take us more by surprise.