Champion vs Supreme - What's the difference?
champion | supreme |
Someone who has been a winner in a contest.
(rfex-sense) Someone who is chosen to represent a group of people in a contest.
Someone who fights for a cause or status.
Someone who fights on another's behalf.
(label) Acting as a champion; that has defeated all one's competitors.
(label) Excellent; beyond compare.
Excellent; superb; deserving of high praise.
Dominant, having power over all others.
* {{quote-magazine, date=2013-06-21, author=
, volume=189, issue=2, page=10, magazine=(The Guardian Weekly)
, title= Greatest, most excellent, extreme, most superior, highest, or utmost.
(botany) Situated at the highest part or point.
* (English Citations of "supreme")
English adjectives commonly used as postmodifiers
(cooking) To divide a citrus fruit into its segments, removing the skin, pith, membranes, and seeds.
(cookery) A breast of chicken or duck with the wing bone attached.
(cookery) Anything from which all skin, bones, and other parts which are not eaten have been removed, such as a skinless fish fillet.
As nouns the difference between champion and supreme
is that champion is someone who has been a winner in a contest while supreme is a breast of chicken or duck with the wing bone attached.As adjectives the difference between champion and supreme
is that champion is acting as a champion; that has defeated all one's competitors while supreme is dominant, having power over all others.As verbs the difference between champion and supreme
is that champion is to promote, advocate, or act as a champion for while supreme is to divide a citrus fruit into its segments, removing the skin, pith, membranes, and seeds.As proper nouns the difference between champion and supreme
is that champion is {{surname} while Supreme is the Supreme Being; the Almighty; God.champion
English
(wikipedia champion)Noun
(en noun)Adjective
(-)References
* * * * ----supreme
English
Adjective
(en-adj)Karen McVeigh
US rules human genes can't be patented, passage=The US supreme court has ruled unanimously that natural human genes cannot be patented, a decision that scientists and civil rights campaigners said removed a major barrier to patient care and medical innovation.}}