for |
were |
In obsolete terms the difference between for and were
is that
for is indicating that in prevention of which, or through fear of which, anything is done while
were is a fine for slaying a man; weregild.
As a conjunction for
is because.
As a preposition for
is towards.
As an initialism FOR
is field Of Research.
As a verb were is
form of Second-person singular simple past tense indicative|be|lang=en.
As a noun were is
man (human male), as in {{term|werewolf||man-wolf|lang=en}}.
done |
were |
As verbs the difference between done and were
is that
done is past participle of lang=en while
were is form of Second-person singular simple past tense indicative|be|lang=en.
As an adjective done
is ready, fully cooked.
As a noun were is
man (human male), as in {{term|werewolf||man-wolf|lang=en}}.
wa |
were |
As an abbreviation WA
is washington, a state of the United States of America.
As an initialism WA
is wing attack.
As a verb were is
form of Second-person singular simple past tense indicative|be|lang=en.
As a noun were is
man (human male), as in {{term|werewolf||man-wolf|lang=en}}.
have |
were |
As verbs the difference between have and were
is that
have is to possess, own, hold while
were is form of Second-person singular simple past tense indicative|be|lang=en.
As a noun were is
man (human male), as in {{term|werewolf||man-wolf|lang=en}}.
there |
were |
In obsolete terms the difference between there and were
is that
there is where, there where, in which place while
were is a fine for slaying a man; weregild.
As nouns the difference between there and were
is that
there is that place while
were is man (human male), as in {{term|werewolf||man-wolf|lang=en}}.
As an adverb there
is in a place or location (stated, implied or otherwise indicated) at some distance from the speaker (
compare here).
As an interjection there
is
Used to offer encouragement or sympathy.As a pronoun there
is Used as an expletive subject of {{term|be in its sense of “exist”, with the semantic, usually indefinite subject being postponed or (occasionally) implied.}.
As a verb were is
form of Second-person singular simple past tense indicative|be|lang=en.
had | were |
As verbs the difference between had and were
is that
had is past tense of have while
were is form of Second-person singular simple past tense indicative|be|lang=en.
As a noun were is
man (human male), as in {{term|werewolf||man-wolf|lang=en}}.
should | were |
As verbs the difference between should and were
is that
should is
Used to form the future tense of the subjunctive mood, usually in the first person.were is form of Second-person singular simple past tense indicative|be|lang=en.
As nouns the difference between should and were
is that
should is a statement of what should be the case as opposed to what is the case while
were is man (human male), as in {{term|werewolf||man-wolf|lang=en}}.
poo | were |
As nouns the difference between poo and were
is that
poo is excrement; faecal matter while
were is man (human male), as in {{term|werewolf||man-wolf|lang=en}}.
As verbs the difference between poo and were
is that
poo is to defecate while
were is form of Second-person singular simple past tense indicative|be|lang=en.
As an interjection poo
is expression of displeasure or failure; shit.
were | vere |
As a verb were
is .
As a noun were
is (archaic) man (human male), as in.
As a proper noun vere is
.
wss | were |
As nouns the difference between wss and were
is that
wss is initialism of w:Web Security Service|Web Security Service while
were is man (human male), as in {{term|werewolf||man-wolf|lang=en}}.
As a verb were is
form of Second-person singular simple past tense indicative|be|lang=en.
Pages
