quality

As adjectives the difference between quality and experienced

is that quality is being of good worth, well made, fit for purpose while experienced is having experience and skill in a subject.

As a noun quality

is level of excellence.

As a verb experienced is

past participle of lang=en.

As nouns the difference between quality and experiences

is that quality is level of excellence while experiences is plural of lang=en.

As an adjective quality

is being of good worth, well made, fit for purpose.

As nouns the difference between novelty and quality

is that novelty is the state of being new or novel; newness while quality is level of excellence.

As an adjective quality is

being of good worth, well made, fit for purpose.

As nouns the difference between preference and quality

is that preference is preference while quality is (uncountable) level of excellence.

As an adjective quality is

being of good worth, well made, fit for purpose.

As nouns the difference between quality and valuable

is that quality is level of excellence while valuable is a personal possession such as jewellery, of relatively great monetary value; — usually used in plural form.

As adjectives the difference between quality and valuable

is that quality is being of good worth, well made, fit for purpose while valuable is having a great value.

As nouns the difference between original and quality

is that original is original while quality is (uncountable) level of excellence.

As an adjective quality is

being of good worth, well made, fit for purpose.

As adjectives the difference between eligible and quality

is that eligible is eligible while quality is being of good worth, well made, fit for purpose.

As a noun quality is

(uncountable) level of excellence.

In archaic terms the difference between quality and potential

is that quality is high social position. (See also {{term|the quality|lang=en}}. while potential is being potent; endowed with energy adequate to a result; efficacious; influential.

As nouns the difference between quality and potential

is that quality is level of excellence while potential is currently unrealized ability (with the most common adposition being to.

As adjectives the difference between quality and potential

is that quality is being of good worth, well made, fit for purpose while potential is existing in possibility, not in actuality.

As nouns the difference between traits and quality

is that traits is while quality is (uncountable) level of excellence.

As an adjective quality is

being of good worth, well made, fit for purpose.

As nouns the difference between extent and quality

is that extent is a range of values or locations while quality is level of excellence.

As adjectives the difference between extent and quality

is that extent is extended while quality is being of good worth, well made, fit for purpose.