In phonetics|lang=en terms the difference between low and low
is that
low is (phonetics) made, as a vowel, with a low position of part of the tongue in relation to the palate while
low is (phonetics) made, as a vowel, with a low position of part of the tongue in relation to the palate.
In archaic|lang=en terms the difference between low and low
is that
low is (archaic) not rich, highly seasoned, or nourishing; plain; simple while
low is (archaic) not rich, highly seasoned, or nourishing; plain; simple.
In meteorology|lang=en terms the difference between low and low
is that
low is (meteorology) an area of low pressure; a depression while
low is (meteorology) an area of low pressure; a depression.
In card games|lang=en terms the difference between low and low
is that
low is (card games) the lowest trump, usually the deuce; the lowest trump dealt or drawn while
low is (card games) the lowest trump, usually the deuce; the lowest trump dealt or drawn.
In astronomy|lang=en terms the difference between low and low
is that
low is (astronomy) in a path near the equator, so that the declination is small, or near the horizon, so that the altitude is small; said of the heavenly bodies with reference to the diurnal revolution while
low is (astronomy) in a path near the equator, so that the declination is small, or near the horizon, so that the altitude is small; said of the heavenly bodies with reference to the diurnal revolution.
In obsolete|transitive|lang=en terms the difference between low and low
is that
low is (obsolete|transitive) to depress; to lower while
low is (obsolete|transitive) to depress; to lower.
In form of|obsolete simple past tense|laugh|lang=en terms the difference between low and low
is that
low is while
low is .
In lang=en terms the difference between low and low
is that
low is to moo while
low is to moo.
In countable|uk|scotland|dialect|lang=en terms the difference between low and low
is that
low is (countable|uk|scotland|dialect) a flame; fire; blaze while
low is (countable|uk|scotland|dialect) a flame; fire; blaze.
In uk|scotland|dialect|lang=en terms the difference between low and low
is that
low is (uk|scotland|dialect) to burn; to blaze while
low is (uk|scotland|dialect) to burn; to blaze.
In archaic|_|or|_|obsolete|lang=en terms the difference between low and low
is that
low is , mound, tumulus while
low is , mound, tumulus.
In scottish dialectal|archaic|lang=en terms the difference between low and low
is that
low is (scottish dialectal|archaic) a hill while
low is (scottish dialectal|archaic) a hill.
As adjectives the difference between low and low
is that
low is in a position comparatively close to the ground while
low is in a position comparatively close to the ground.
As nouns the difference between low and low
is that
low is something that is low; a low point or
low can be (countable|uk|scotland|dialect) a flame; fire; blaze or
low can be , mound, tumulus while
low is something that is low; a low point or
low can be (countable|uk|scotland|dialect) a flame; fire; blaze or
low can be , mound, tumulus.
As adverbs the difference between low and low
is that
low is close to the ground while
low is close to the ground.
As verbs the difference between low and low
is that
low is (obsolete|transitive) to depress; to lower or
low can be or
low can be to moo or
low can be (uk|scotland|dialect) to burn; to blaze while
low is (obsolete|transitive) to depress; to lower or
low can be or
low can be to moo or
low can be (uk|scotland|dialect) to burn; to blaze.