emotivism

As nouns the difference between emotivism and sentimentalism

is that emotivism is (ethics) the meta-ethical stance that ethical judgments, such as those containing the words "should" and "ought to", are primarily expressions of one's own attitude and imperatives meant to change the attitudes and actions of another while sentimentalism is a liking for sentimental things.

In ethics terms the difference between emotivism and egoism

is that emotivism is the meta-ethical stance that ethical judgments, such as those containing the words "should" and "ought to", are primarily expressions of one's own attitude and imperatives meant to change the attitudes and actions of another while egoism is the belief that moral behavior should be directed toward one's self-interest only.

As nouns the difference between intuitionism and emotivism

is that intuitionism is an approach to mathematics/logic which avoids proof by contradiction, and which requires that, in order to prove that something exists, one must construct it while emotivism is the meta-ethical stance that ethical judgments, such as those containing the words "should" and "ought to", are primarily expressions of one's own attitude and imperatives meant to change the attitudes and actions of another.

In ethics terms the difference between emotivism and nihilism

is that emotivism is the meta-ethical stance that ethical judgments, such as those containing the words "should" and "ought to", are primarily expressions of one's own attitude and imperatives meant to change the attitudes and actions of another while nihilism is the rejection of inherent or objective moral principles.

As a noun emotivism is

(ethics) the meta-ethical stance that ethical judgments, such as those containing the words "should" and "ought to", are primarily expressions of one's own attitude and imperatives meant to change the attitudes and actions of another.

As nouns the difference between emotivism and emotivist

is that emotivism is (ethics) the meta-ethical stance that ethical judgments, such as those containing the words "should" and "ought to", are primarily expressions of one's own attitude and imperatives meant to change the attitudes and actions of another while emotivist is a proponent of emotivism.

As an adjective emotivist is

pertaining to emotivism.

As nouns the difference between taxonomy and emotivism

is that taxonomy is the science or the technique used to make a classification while emotivism is (ethics) the meta-ethical stance that ethical judgments, such as those containing the words "should" and "ought to", are primarily expressions of one's own attitude and imperatives meant to change the attitudes and actions of another.

As an adjective imperative

is .

As a noun emotivism is

(ethics) the meta-ethical stance that ethical judgments, such as those containing the words "should" and "ought to", are primarily expressions of one's own attitude and imperatives meant to change the attitudes and actions of another.

As nouns the difference between attitude and emotivism

is that attitude is while emotivism is (ethics) the meta-ethical stance that ethical judgments, such as those containing the words "should" and "ought to", are primarily expressions of one's own attitude and imperatives meant to change the attitudes and actions of another.

As nouns the difference between ethical and emotivism

is that ethical is an ethical drug while emotivism is the meta-ethical stance that ethical judgments, such as those containing the words "should" and "ought to", are primarily expressions of one's own attitude and imperatives meant to change the attitudes and actions of another.

As an adjective ethical

is of or relating to the study of ethics.