Bisexual vs Null - What's the difference?
bisexual | null |
(sexuality, of humans or other animals) Sexually attracted to members of two or more genders.
(botany) Of flowers: having both pollen and seeds.
(botany) Of sporophytes: having both male and female organs.
(botany) Of gametophytes: producing both eggs and sperm.
(botany) Of fungi: producing both the "female" ascogonium and the "male" antheridium.
(rare) Hermaphroditic.
A person who is bisexual. Someone who is attracted to people of two or more genders.
A non-existent or empty value or set of values.
Zero]] quantity of [[expression, expressions; nothing.
Something that has no force or meaning.
(computing) the ASCII or Unicode character (), represented by a zero value, that indicates no character and is sometimes used as a string terminator.
(computing) the attribute of an entity that has no valid value.
One of the beads in nulled work.
(statistics) null hypothesis
Having no validity, "null and void"
insignificant
* 1924 , Marcel Proust, Within a Budding Grove :
absent or non-existent
(mathematics) of the null set
(mathematics) of or comprising a value of precisely zero
(genetics, of a mutation) causing a complete loss of gene function, amorphic.
As nouns the difference between bisexual and null
is that bisexual is bisexual while null is zero, nil; the cardinal number before einn.bisexual
English
Adjective
(en adjective)- Midrash and Zohar present Adam as hermaphroditic or bisexual .
Hyponyms
* heteroflexibleSynonyms
* (sexually attracted to persons of either sex) (slang), ambidextrous (jocular), bi (colloquial) * perfect, hermaphrodite * See alsoCoordinate terms
*Noun
(en noun)- I have two family members who came out as bisexual ; my sister and my aunt.
Synonyms
* bi (colloquial) * See alsoHypernyms
*LGBTAlso see
* ----null
English
Noun
(en noun)- (Francis Bacon)
- Since no date of birth was entered for the patient, his age is null .
Adjective
(en adjective)- In proportion as we descend the social scale our snobbishness fastens on to mere nothings which are perhaps no more null than the distinctions observed by the aristocracy, but, being more obscure, more peculiar to the individual, take us more by surprise.