Arbiter vs Linesman - What's the difference?
arbiter | linesman |
A person appointed, or chosen, by parties to determine a controversy between them; an arbitrator.
* 1931 , William Bennett Munro, The government of the United States, national, state, and local , page 495
(with of) A person or object having the power of judging and determining, or ordaining, without control; one whose power of deciding and governing is not limited.
(electronics) A component in circuitry that allocates scarce resources.
To act as arbiter.
* 2003 , Jean-Benoit Nadeau, Julie Barlow, Sixty Million Frenchmen Can't be Wrong: Why We Love France But Not the French , page 116
(football, dated) An assistant referee.
(tennis, dated) A male line judge.
(ice hockey) An official whose primary task is to watch the blue line and determine when there has been an offside.
(American football) An official whose primary task is to determine whether there has been a line of scrimmage violation.
A person employed to work on electrical lines; a lineman.
As nouns the difference between arbiter and linesman
is that arbiter is a person appointed, or chosen, by parties to determine a controversy between them; an arbitrator while linesman is an assistant referee.As a verb arbiter
is to act as arbiter.arbiter
English
Noun
(en noun)- In order to protect individual liberty there must be an arbiter between the governing powers and the governed.
- Television and film, not ''Vogue and similar magazines, are the arbiters of fashion.
Verb
(en verb)- Worse, since there was no institution to arbiter disagreements between Parliament and the government, whenever Parliament voted against the government on the smallest issues, coalitions fragmented, and governments had to be recomposed.