Apanthropinization vs Apanthropinisation - What's the difference?
apanthropinization | apanthropinisation | Alternative forms |
(rare) The broadening of the ambit of one’s preoccupations and concerns away from a narrow focus on those things most palpably human and most closely pertinent to humanity.“apanthropinization” listed
* 1880, Oct.: , Mind'', volume 5 (? 20),
* 1881, Jan.: '', volume 18 (1880–1881),
* 2005, Mar.: Anne-Julia Zwierlein (editor), Unmapped Countries: Biological Visions in Nineteenth-Century Literature and Culture ,
Apanthropinization is an alternative form of apanthropinisation.
As nouns the difference between apanthropinization and apanthropinisation
is that apanthropinization is while apanthropinisation is (rare) the broadening of the ambit of one’s preoccupations and concerns away from a narrow focus on those things most palpably human and most closely pertinent to humanity“apanthropinization” listed [http://booksgooglecouk/books?id=qhccaaaamaaj&q=apanthropinization&dq=apanthropinization&ei=hdvwsctmhqkiyasj8aidbw&pgis=1 on pages 50–51] of joseph twadell shipley’s dictionary of early english (1955 ; philosophical library).apanthropinisation
English
Alternative forms
* apanthropinizationNoun
(-)on pages 50–51of Joseph Twadell Shipley’s Dictionary of Early English (1955 ; Philosophical Library)
page 451] [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=F_0EAAAAQAAJ&q=apanthropinisation&dq=apanthropinisation&ei=_c1WSdnaDKTmyAT-67mlCQ&pgis=1 ?] (Williams and Norgate) · (also quoted, with scant little alteration, [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=3pINAAAAQAAJ&q=apanthropinisation&dq=apanthropinisation&ei=_c1WSdnaDKTmyAT-67mlCQ&pgis=1 on page 292] of ''The Academy[? 18, 1880)
- In short, the primitive human conception of beauty must, I believe, have been purely anthropinistic'' — must have gathered mainly around the personality of man or woman; and all its subsequent history must be that of an ''apanthropinisation (I apologise for the ugly but convenient word), a gradual regression or concentric widening of æsthetic feeling around this fixed point which remains to the very last its natural centre.
page 344] [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=aaMVAAAAYAAJ&dq=apanthropinization&ei=HdVWScTmHqKIyASJ8aiDBw ?] (D. Appleton); quoting ''verbatim'', but not ''literatim'', the text of the first occurrence in ''Mind[1880] [[#Quotations, hereinbefore] (minor adjustments to Americanise the spelling have been made)
- In short, the primitive human conception of beauty must, I believe, have been purely anthropinistic'' — must have gathered mainly around the personality of man or woman; and all its subsequent history must be that of an ''apanthropinization (I apologize for the ugly but convenient word), a gradual regression or concentric widening of æsthetic feeling around this fixed point which remains to the very last its natural center.
page 114] ([http://www.anthempress.com/product_info.php?&products_id=143&osCsid= Anthem Press; ISBN 1843311607, 978?1843311607)
- From this early, ‘anthropinistic’ stage, at which all aesthetic feeling is ‘gathered mainly around the personality of man or woman’, human aesthetic feeling gradually evolves in a process of apanthropinization , ‘a gradual regression or concentric widening of aesthetic feeling around this fixed point’,59 and advances to the appreciation of beauty in nature.60