Analyzed vs Arational - What's the difference?
analyzed | arational |
(chiefly, philosophy) Not within the domain of what can be understood or analyzed by reason; not rational, outside the competence of the rules of reason.
* 1938 , Marten Ten Hoor, "The Philistines over Philosophy," The Journal of Philosophy , vol. 35, no. 20, p. 542:
* 1974 , , "Why Should I Believe in Science?" Philosophy and Phenomenological Research , vol. 34, no. 4, p. 484:
*1996 , (David Foster Wallace), Infinite Jest , Abacus 2013, p. 146:
*:Regarded with the objectivity of hindsight, the illusion appears arational , almost fantastic: it would be like being able both to lie and to trust other people at the same time.
* 2001 , Ronald De Sousa, "Moral Emotions," Ethical Theory and Moral Practice , vol. 4, no. 2, p. 109:
As adjectives the difference between analyzed and arational
is that analyzed is examined closely, carefully considered while arational is (chiefly|philosophy) not within the domain of what can be understood or analyzed by reason; not rational, outside the competence of the rules of reason.As a verb analyzed
is (us) past tense and past participle of to analyze .arational
English
Adjective
(en adjective)- If the end-product of a man's philosophizing about the nature of the cosmos is the ultimate, arational matter, this will affect his moral opinion of the cosmos.
- Scientific knowledge is conceptual, rational, and testable. Mystical knowledge is usually aconceptual, arational , and does not lend itself to interpersonal testing.
- On the first view, emotions are purely biological phenomena. . . . They are arational and amoral, like other natural bodily functions.