Analogous vs Counterfactual - What's the difference?
analogous | counterfactual |
Having analogy; corresponding to something else; bearing some resemblance or proportion;—often followed by "to".
* 2013 , Martina Hyde, Is the pope Catholic?'' (in ''The Guardian , 20 September 2013)[http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/20/is-pope-catholic-atheists-gay-people-abortion]
* Analogous tendencies in arts and manners. --De Quincey.
* Decay of public spirit, which may be considered analogous to natural death. --J. H. Newman.
Contrary to the facts; untrue.
* '>citation
A claim, hypothesis, or other belief that is contrary to the facts.
(philosophy) A conditional statement in which the conditional clause is false, as "If I had arrived on time . . ."."
* 1952', B. J. Diggs, "VI.—'''Counterfactual Conditionals," ''Mind , vol. 61, no. 244, page 513:
As adjectives the difference between analogous and counterfactual
is that analogous is having analogy; corresponding to something else; bearing some resemblance or proportion;—often followed by "to" while counterfactual is contrary to the facts; untrue.As a noun counterfactual is
a claim, hypothesis, or other belief that is contrary to the facts.analogous
English
Adjective
(en adjective)- After all, if we think of the Vatican as a vast and hugely successful multinational corporation, then this interview would appear to be the equivalent of a profits warning. At the very least, it would seem to be tinkering with the formula of the biggest spiritual brand in the world, analogous to Coca-Cola changing its famous recipe in 1985.
Synonyms
* (having analogy) correspondent, like, similar, comparable, parallelReferences
*counterfactual
English
(wikipedia counterfactual)Adjective
(head)Noun
(en noun)counterfactual" in A Dictionary of Philosophical Terms and Names'' (Garth Kemerling, 1997-2002)''Random House Webster's Unabridged Electronic Dictionary (1987-1996)
- In recent years there has been increasing discussion of the "problem of counterfactuals ". One way of formulating this problem is as follows: "What is meant when one asserts a conditional statement, the antecedent of which is contrary to fact?"
