empiricism |
episteme |
In philosophy terms the difference between empiricism and episteme
is that
empiricism is a doctrine which holds that the only or, at least, the most reliable source of human knowledge is experience, especially perception by means of the physical senses. (Often contrasted with rationalism.)
Dictionary of Philosophy,
Dagobert D. Runes (ed.), Philosophical Library, 1962.
See: "Empiricism" by Morris T. Keeton, p. 89 which explains 9 philosophical senses of "empiricism."
The Encyclopedia of Philosophy,
Paul Edwards (ed.), Macmillan, 1967.
See: "Empiricism" by D. W. Hamlyn, vol. 2, pp. 499-505 while
episteme is scientific knowledge; a principled system of understanding; sometimes contrasted with {{term|empiricism|lang=en}}.
As nouns the difference between empiricism and episteme
is that
empiricism is a pursuit of knowledge purely through experience, especially by means of observation and sometimes by experimentation while
episteme is scientific knowledge; a principled system of understanding; sometimes contrasted with {{term|empiricism|lang=en}}.
theory |
empiricism |
As nouns the difference between theory and empiricism
is that
theory is mental conception; reflection, consideration while
empiricism is a pursuit of knowledge purely through experience, especially by means of observation and sometimes by experimentation.
phenomenalism |
empiricism |
In philosophy terms the difference between phenomenalism and empiricism
is that
phenomenalism is the doctrine that physical objects exist only as perceptual phenomena or sensory stimuli while
empiricism is a doctrine which holds that the only or, at least, the most reliable source of human knowledge is experience, especially perception by means of the physical senses. (Often contrasted with rationalism.)
Dictionary of Philosophy,
Dagobert D. Runes (ed.), Philosophical Library, 1962.
See: "Empiricism" by Morris T. Keeton, p. 89 which explains 9 philosophical senses of "empiricism."
The Encyclopedia of Philosophy,
Paul Edwards (ed.), Macmillan, 1967.
See: "Empiricism" by D. W. Hamlyn, vol. 2, pp. 499-505.
empiricism |
idealism |
In philosophy terms the difference between empiricism and idealism
is that
empiricism is a doctrine which holds that the only or, at least, the most reliable source of human knowledge is experience, especially perception by means of the physical senses. (Often contrasted with rationalism.)
Dictionary of Philosophy,
Dagobert D. Runes (ed.), Philosophical Library, 1962.
See: "Empiricism" by Morris T. Keeton, p. 89 which explains 9 philosophical senses of "empiricism."
The Encyclopedia of Philosophy,
Paul Edwards (ed.), Macmillan, 1967.
See: "Empiricism" by D. W. Hamlyn, vol. 2, pp. 499-505 while
idealism is an approach to philosophical enquiry which asserts that direct and immediate knowledge can only be had of ideas or mental pictures.
As nouns the difference between empiricism and idealism
is that
empiricism is a pursuit of knowledge purely through experience, especially by means of observation and sometimes by experimentation while
idealism is the property of a person of having high ideals that are usually unrealizable or at odds with practical life.
theorist |
empiricism |
As nouns the difference between theorist and empiricism
is that
theorist is someone who constructs theories, especially in the arts or sciences while
empiricism is a pursuit of knowledge purely through experience, especially by means of observation and sometimes by experimentation.
nominalism |
empiricism |
In philosophy|lang=en terms the difference between nominalism and empiricism
is that
nominalism is (philosophy) a doctrine that universals do not have an existence except as names for classes of concrete objects while
empiricism is (philosophy) a doctrine which holds that the only or, at least, the most reliable source of human knowledge is experience, especially perception by means of the physical senses (often contrasted with rationalism)
[dictionary of philosophy'', (ed), macmillan, 1967 ''see: "empiricism" by d w hamlyn, vol 2, pp 499-505].
As nouns the difference between nominalism and empiricism
is that
nominalism is (philosophy) a doctrine that universals do not have an existence except as names for classes of concrete objects while
empiricism is a pursuit of knowledge purely through experience, especially by means of observation and sometimes by experimentation.
empiricism |
constructivism |
As nouns the difference between constructivism and empiricism
is that
constructivism is a Russian movement in modern art characterized by the creation of nonrepresentational geometric objects using industrial materials while
empiricism is a pursuit of knowledge purely through experience, especially by means of observation and sometimes by experimentation.
typology |
empiricism |
As nouns the difference between typology and empiricism
is that
typology is the systematic classification of the types of something according to their common characteristics while
empiricism is a pursuit of knowledge purely through experience, especially by means of observation and sometimes by experimentation.
naturalism |
empiricism |
In philosophy terms the difference between naturalism and empiricism
is that
naturalism is a doctrine which denies a strong separation between scientific and philosophic methodologies and/or topics while
empiricism is a doctrine which holds that the only or, at least, the most reliable source of human knowledge is experience, especially perception by means of the physical senses. (Often contrasted with rationalism.)
Dictionary of Philosophy,
Dagobert D. Runes (ed.), Philosophical Library, 1962.
See: "Empiricism" by Morris T. Keeton, p. 89 which explains 9 philosophical senses of "empiricism."
The Encyclopedia of Philosophy,
Paul Edwards (ed.), Macmillan, 1967.
See: "Empiricism" by D. W. Hamlyn, vol. 2, pp. 499-505.
As nouns the difference between naturalism and empiricism
is that
naturalism is a state of nature; conformity to nature while
empiricism is a pursuit of knowledge purely through experience, especially by means of observation and sometimes by experimentation.
empiricism |
functionalism |
In philosophy terms the difference between empiricism and functionalism
is that
empiricism is a doctrine which holds that the only or, at least, the most reliable source of human knowledge is experience, especially perception by means of the physical senses. (Often contrasted with rationalism.)
Dictionary of Philosophy,
Dagobert D. Runes (ed.), Philosophical Library, 1962.
See: "Empiricism" by Morris T. Keeton, p. 89 which explains 9 philosophical senses of "empiricism."
The Encyclopedia of Philosophy,
Paul Edwards (ed.), Macmillan, 1967.
See: "Empiricism" by D. W. Hamlyn, vol. 2, pp. 499-505 while
functionalism is the definition of mental states in terms of their causes and effects.
As nouns the difference between empiricism and functionalism
is that
empiricism is a pursuit of knowledge purely through experience, especially by means of observation and sometimes by experimentation while
functionalism is a doctrine, in several fields, that the function of something should be reflected in its design and the materials used in its construction.
Pages